Agendaism: The Politically Correct Way to Destroy Academia

March 2008

Last issue, I pointed out that those engaged in agendaism tended to engage in four unethical behaviors: lying and or distorting the data, labeling and libeling critics, implying consensus when in fact none exists, and the use of scare tactics and indoctrination. In my research regarding ethics, I have witnessed these behaviors repeatedly, and from many different groups regarding many different agendas.

We're sorry. This article is available only to DPA members. To continue reading, please login or consider joining the DPA to gain access.

Agendaism: The Politically Correct Way to Destroy Academia

March 2008

Last issue, I pointed out that those engaged in agendaism tended to engage in four unethical behaviors: lying and or distorting the data, labeling and libeling critics, implying consensus when in fact none exists, and the use of scare tactics and indoctrination. In my research regarding ethics, I have witnessed these behaviors repeatedly, and from many different groups regarding many different agendas.

We're sorry. This article is available only to DPA members. To continue reading, please login or consider joining the DPA to gain access.

What Can I Do?

Agendaism: The Politically Correct Way to Destroy Academia

March 2008

Last issue, I pointed out that those engaged in agendaism tended to engage in four unethical behaviors: lying and or distorting the data, labeling and libeling critics, implying consensus when in fact none exists, and the use of scare tactics and indoctrination. In my research regarding ethics, I have witnessed these behaviors repeatedly, and from many different groups regarding many different agendas.

We're sorry. This article is available only to DPA members. To continue reading, please login or consider joining the DPA to gain access.

Agendaism: The Politically Correct Way to Destroy Academia

March 2008

Last issue, I pointed out that those engaged in agendaism tended to engage in four unethical behaviors: lying and or distorting the data, labeling and libeling critics, implying consensus when in fact none exists, and the use of scare tactics and indoctrination. In my research regarding ethics, I have witnessed these behaviors repeatedly, and from many different groups regarding many different agendas.

We're sorry. This article is available only to DPA members. To continue reading, please login or consider joining the DPA to gain access.

Agendaism: The Politically Correct Way to Destroy Academia

March 2008

Last issue, I pointed out that those engaged in agendaism tended to engage in four unethical behaviors: lying and or distorting the data, labeling and libeling critics, implying consensus when in fact none exists, and the use of scare tactics and indoctrination. In my research regarding ethics, I have witnessed these behaviors repeatedly, and from many different groups regarding many different agendas.

We're sorry. This article is available only to DPA members. To continue reading, please login or consider joining the DPA to gain access.

Agendaism: The Politically Correct Way to Destroy Academia

March 2008

Last issue, I pointed out that those engaged in agendaism tended to engage in four unethical behaviors: lying and or distorting the data, labeling and libeling critics, implying consensus when in fact none exists, and the use of scare tactics and indoctrination. In my research regarding ethics, I have witnessed these behaviors repeatedly, and from many different groups regarding many different agendas.

We're sorry. This article is available only to DPA members. To continue reading, please login or consider joining the DPA to gain access.