OU Leads Long List of IBA Winners

A team of five graduate students representing the School of Geology and Geophysics at University of Oklahoma rose to the top level and won first place in the second annual IBA competition – but the 2008 AAPG Imperial Barrel Award program produced winners on all levels. The event was held at the recent AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition in San Antonio.

The IBA program is designed to allow teams of students the chance to evaluate the petroleum potential of a sedimentary basin and to test their creative geological interpretations. This is all done within strict time limits of five-to-six weeks, with the results presented to – and judged by – an independent panel of petroleum industry experts.

Through this program, young explorers are motivated to develop their creative oilfinding skills at an early stage in their geological training, using real world data and working within a simulated industry environment, i.e. limited data, short study period and an even shorter presentation time.

Student Winners

From the original 34 university teams, 12 teams advanced to the global finals competition. On Friday preceding the convention these 12 teams competed in the semi-finals round for the chance to participate in the finals presentation the following day.

From that competition, six teams advanced to the final round, presenting to a new panel of judges on Saturday.

Suspense and anticipation lingered until the Student Reception and awards ceremony on Monday night. There, amid a crowd-filled room, IBA Committee Chair, Connie Mongold, announced the winning teams. In reverse order, they are:

The team from the University of Oklahoma – including faculty adviser Roger Slatt, second from the right – celebrates winning this year’s Imperial Barrel Award competition.
The team from the University of Oklahoma – including faculty adviser Roger Slatt, second from the right – celebrates winning this year’s Imperial Barrel Award competition.

  • 6th Place – University of Louisiana- Lafayette.
  • 5th Place – University of West Virginia.
  • 4th Place – University of Alberta.
  • 3rd Place – Texas Christian University ($5,000 prize).
  • 2nd Place – Imperial College, London ($10,000).
  • 1st Place – University of Oklahoma ($20,000).

All were recognized with a standing ovation and Olympic-style medals.

The first place team members are Elizabeth Baruch, Roderick Perez, Romina Portas, Carlos Russian and Carlos Santacruz, with Roger Slatt, faculty adviser. All are first year master’s students, and none have yet had company internship experience.

Their prize money will go into the coffers of the OU AAPG Student Chapter in support of student activities.

However, team member Elizabeth Baruch found the real prize of IBA to be the invaluable training.

“We faced situations that were completely new and required group commitment and support, making our own decisions about what we considered important,” she said, “and defining how the project had to be oriented gave us the feeling of an actual, everyday industry environment.”

Even those who finished lower in the competition found reason to cheer.

“It (IBA) means a lot more than I initially thought it would,” said Andrew J. Mumpy, a member of the University of Alberta team. “I had no idea how big of a deal this thing had become…

“This was the best learning experience I have had in university at any level,” Mumpy said. “I easily learned as much in those two months as I have in any class I’ve ever taken, and the team dynamics and strict deadlines really added to the value of the experience.

“Ideally, I think this competition would be a requirement for any student working on an advanced degree in petroleum geology,” he added. “Despite the fact that I had almost no previous experience doing this type of work, by the time IBA was over I felt like I would be comfortable going to work in an exploration department at any company.”

Faculty Winners

The competitiveness of the students’ presentations demonstrated the strength of the competing schools’ academic programs – and the unexpectedly exceptional performances by teams from universities with smaller programs or without traditional petroleum programs demonstrates that IBA is open to all schools willing to compete at the highest levels.

Recognition goes to the faculty advisers for their work in preparing their students for this rigorous competition.

All 34 universities will keep the IBA dataset for use as a curriculum development tool.

Judging Panel Winners

Key to the IBA learning experience is the role of the judging panel. Judges with titles such as senior marketing geoscientist, chief geoscientist, VP-exploration and president came from leading industry companies. Along with scoring each team’s presentation, IBA judges challenged, coached, encouraged and provided honest feedback.

Students came away knowing their presentation skills and understanding of geoscience had grown, regardless of their team’s competition ranking.

For some, serving as an IBA judge enhanced linkages between industry, universities and AAPG student chapters. For others the opportunity to serve as an IBA judge was a recruitment opportunity.

“I learned more about the students from watching them present and answer questions than I could have learned from a two-hour interview session,” said David Miner, manager of technology for Aera Energy LLC in Bakersfield, Calif.

Sponsor Winners

Without our sponsors, IBA would not be possible. To the 37 sponsors worldwide who have generously given both in-kind and financial support for the program, we say THANK YOU!

Comments (0)


Regions and Sections

Regions and Sections Column - Carol McGowen
Carol Cain McGowen is the development manager for AAPG's Regions and Sections. She may be contacted via email , or telephone at 1-918-560-9403.

Regions and Sections Column

Regions and Sections is a regular column in the EXPLORER offering news for and about AAPG's six international Regions and six U.S. Sections. News items, press releases and other information should be submitted via email or to: EXPLORER - Regions and Sections, P.O. Box 979, Tulsa, OK 74101. 

View column archives

See Also: Book

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 4435 Book
Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 22170 Book

See Also: Bulletin Article

The fact that velocity models based on seismic reflection surveys commonly do not consider the near-surface geology necessitates filling the gap between the top of a velocity model and the surface of the Earth. In this study, we present a new workflow to build a shallow geologic model based exclusively on borehole data and corroborated by laboratory measurements. The study area is in Chemery (France), located at the southwestern border of the Paris Basin, where a large amount of borehole data is publicly available. The workflow starts with identifying lithologic interfaces in the boreholes and interpolating them between the boreholes. The three-dimensional (3-D) geometry of the lithologies then allows interpretation of the position, orientation, and offset of fault planes. Given the importance of the fault interpretation in the modeling process, a combination of different approaches is used to obtain the most reasonable structural framework. After creating a 3-D grid, the resulting 3-D structural model is populated with upscaled velocity logs from the boreholes, yielding the final near-surface P-wave velocity model. To better constrain the velocity model, we conducted laboratory measurements of P- and S-wave velocities in dry and water-saturated conditions on all lithologies in the model. The laboratory data were used to populate the 3-D near-surface model with VP/VS ratio values. The presented workflow accounts for one-dimensional borehole data and is much more iterative and time-consuming than workflows based on two-dimensional seismic sections. Nevertheless, the workflow results in a robust 3-D near-surface model allowing for structural interpretations and revealing the 3-D seismic velocity field.
Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/building-a-three-dimensional-near-surface-geologic.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 5684 Bulletin Article

See Also: Energy Policy Blog

18 percent of AAPG members are women, up from 10 percent in 2006.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/future-oil-and-gas-opportunities-for-women-and-minorities-2014-04apr-16-hero.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 12894 Energy Policy Blog

See Also: Workshop

This interdisciplinary two-day workshop will provide participants with the opportunity to describe and discuss the Sinai basins from a holistic perspective, to consider predictive exploration models for the less explored regions and perhaps gain new insights for those areas thought to be already mature. Experts on the Eastern Mediterranean-Levant, Nile Delta, Gulf of Suez, Northern Red Sea, Gulf of Aqaba-Dead Sea, and Sinai interior basins will lead the sessions. The workshop is organized by the AAPG Africa Region and the Egyptian Petroleum Exploration Society.
Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/ws-Hammam-Faraun-Fault-line-scarp-Gulf-of-Suez-hero.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 22043 Workshop