OU Leads Long List of IBA Winners

A team of five graduate students representing the School of Geology and Geophysics at University of Oklahoma rose to the top level and won first place in the second annual IBA competition – but the 2008 AAPG Imperial Barrel Award program produced winners on all levels. The event was held at the recent AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition in San Antonio.

The IBA program is designed to allow teams of students the chance to evaluate the petroleum potential of a sedimentary basin and to test their creative geological interpretations. This is all done within strict time limits of five-to-six weeks, with the results presented to – and judged by – an independent panel of petroleum industry experts.

Through this program, young explorers are motivated to develop their creative oilfinding skills at an early stage in their geological training, using real world data and working within a simulated industry environment, i.e. limited data, short study period and an even shorter presentation time.

Student Winners

From the original 34 university teams, 12 teams advanced to the global finals competition. On Friday preceding the convention these 12 teams competed in the semi-finals round for the chance to participate in the finals presentation the following day.

From that competition, six teams advanced to the final round, presenting to a new panel of judges on Saturday.

Suspense and anticipation lingered until the Student Reception and awards ceremony on Monday night. There, amid a crowd-filled room, IBA Committee Chair, Connie Mongold, announced the winning teams. In reverse order, they are:

The team from the University of Oklahoma – including faculty adviser Roger Slatt, second from the right – celebrates winning this year’s Imperial Barrel Award competition.
The team from the University of Oklahoma – including faculty adviser Roger Slatt, second from the right – celebrates winning this year’s Imperial Barrel Award competition.

  • 6th Place – University of Louisiana- Lafayette.
  • 5th Place – University of West Virginia.
  • 4th Place – University of Alberta.
  • 3rd Place – Texas Christian University ($5,000 prize).
  • 2nd Place – Imperial College, London ($10,000).
  • 1st Place – University of Oklahoma ($20,000).

All were recognized with a standing ovation and Olympic-style medals.

The first place team members are Elizabeth Baruch, Roderick Perez, Romina Portas, Carlos Russian and Carlos Santacruz, with Roger Slatt, faculty adviser. All are first year master’s students, and none have yet had company internship experience.

Their prize money will go into the coffers of the OU AAPG Student Chapter in support of student activities.

However, team member Elizabeth Baruch found the real prize of IBA to be the invaluable training.

“We faced situations that were completely new and required group commitment and support, making our own decisions about what we considered important,” she said, “and defining how the project had to be oriented gave us the feeling of an actual, everyday industry environment.”

Even those who finished lower in the competition found reason to cheer.

“It (IBA) means a lot more than I initially thought it would,” said Andrew J. Mumpy, a member of the University of Alberta team. “I had no idea how big of a deal this thing had become…

“This was the best learning experience I have had in university at any level,” Mumpy said. “I easily learned as much in those two months as I have in any class I’ve ever taken, and the team dynamics and strict deadlines really added to the value of the experience.

“Ideally, I think this competition would be a requirement for any student working on an advanced degree in petroleum geology,” he added. “Despite the fact that I had almost no previous experience doing this type of work, by the time IBA was over I felt like I would be comfortable going to work in an exploration department at any company.”

Faculty Winners

The competitiveness of the students’ presentations demonstrated the strength of the competing schools’ academic programs – and the unexpectedly exceptional performances by teams from universities with smaller programs or without traditional petroleum programs demonstrates that IBA is open to all schools willing to compete at the highest levels.

Recognition goes to the faculty advisers for their work in preparing their students for this rigorous competition.

All 34 universities will keep the IBA dataset for use as a curriculum development tool.

Judging Panel Winners

Key to the IBA learning experience is the role of the judging panel. Judges with titles such as senior marketing geoscientist, chief geoscientist, VP-exploration and president came from leading industry companies. Along with scoring each team’s presentation, IBA judges challenged, coached, encouraged and provided honest feedback.

Students came away knowing their presentation skills and understanding of geoscience had grown, regardless of their team’s competition ranking.

For some, serving as an IBA judge enhanced linkages between industry, universities and AAPG student chapters. For others the opportunity to serve as an IBA judge was a recruitment opportunity.

“I learned more about the students from watching them present and answer questions than I could have learned from a two-hour interview session,” said David Miner, manager of technology for Aera Energy LLC in Bakersfield, Calif.

Sponsor Winners

Without our sponsors, IBA would not be possible. To the 37 sponsors worldwide who have generously given both in-kind and financial support for the program, we say THANK YOU!

Comments (0)


Regions and Sections

Regions and Sections Column - Carol McGowen
Carol Cain McGowen is the development manager for AAPG's Regions and Sections. She may be contacted via email , or telephone at 1-918-560-9403.

Regions and Sections Column

Regions and Sections is a regular column in the EXPLORER offering news for and about AAPG's six international Regions and six U.S. Sections. News items, press releases and other information should be submitted via email or to: EXPLORER - Regions and Sections, P.O. Box 979, Tulsa, OK 74101. 

View column archives

See Also: Bulletin Article

The origin of thermogenic natural gas in the shallow stratigraphy of northeastern Pennsylvania is associated, in part, with interbedded coal identified in numerous outcrops of the Upper Devonian Catskill and Lock Haven Formations. Historically documented and newly identified locations of Upper Devonian coal stringers are shown to be widespread, both laterally across the region and vertically throughout the stratigraphic section of the Catskill and Lock Haven Formations. Coal samples exhibited considerable gas source potential with total organic carbon as high as 44.40% by weight, with a mean of 13.66% for 23 sample locations analyzed. Upper Devonian coal is thermogenically mature; calculated vitrinite reflectances range from 1.25% to 2.89%, with most samples falling within the dry-gas window. Source potential is further supported by gas shows observed while drilling through shallow, identifiable coal horizons, which are at times located within fresh groundwater aquifers. Thermogenic gas detected in area water wells during predrill baseline sampling is determined not only to be naturally occurring, but also common in the region.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/geologic-and-baseline-groundwater-evidence-for.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 5776 Bulletin Article

Field analogs allow a better characterization of fracture networks to constrain naturally fractured reservoir models. In analogs, the origin, nature, geometry, and other attributes of fracture networks can be determined and can be related to the reservoir through the geodynamic history. In this article, we aim to determine the sedimentary and diagenetic controls on fracture patterns and the genetic correlation of fracture and diagenesis with tectonic and burial history. We targeted two outcrops of Barremian carbonates located on both limbs of the Nerthe anticline (southeastern France). We analyzed fracture patterns and rock facies as well as the tectonic, diagenetic, and burial history of both sites. Fracture patterns are determined from geometric, kinematic, and diagenetic criteria based on field and lab measurements. Fracture sequences are defined based on crosscutting and abutting relationships and compared with geodynamic history and subsidence curves. This analysis shows that fractures are organized in two close-to-perpendicular joint sets (i.e., mode I). Fracture average spacing is 50 cm (20 in.). Fracture size neither depends on fracture orientation nor is controlled by bed thickness. Neither mechanical stratigraphy nor fracture stratigraphy is observed at outcrop scale. Comparing fracture sequences and subsidence curves shows that fractures existed prior to folding and formed during early burial. Consequently, the Nerthe fold induced by the Pyrenean compression did not result in any new fracture initiation on the limbs of this fold. We assume that the studied Urgonian carbonates underwent early diagenesis, which conferred early brittle properties to the host rock.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/tectonic-versus-diagenetic-origin-of-fractures.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 5726 Bulletin Article

See Also: CD DVD

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 4516 CD-DVD
Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 4573 CD-DVD
Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 4053 CD-DVD