Division Column: EMD

Shale: An Evolution, Not a Revolution

Scott Tinker, speaking at the EMD luncheon in Houston.
Scott Tinker, speaking at the EMD luncheon in Houston.

When you need in-depth, science-based information on shale plays and issues, AAPG past president Scott Tinker has the reputation as the go-to guy.

He played that role again at the recent AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition in Houston.

Tinker was a high profile presence at the ACE in Houston, where he chaired a forum focused in large part on hydraulic fracturing and was the featured speaker at the EMD luncheon talking about, of course, shale.

For starters he emphasized that the relatively new shale phenomenon is not a revolution as it’s usually tagged.

“It’s an evolution, although pretty quick,” he said. “The technology, demand, creativity, risk – the things we’ve always had in this business – drove this evolution.”

Attesting to its impact, Tinker noted humorously: “In the 1980s, if you cored a shale, you got fired; in 2010 if you didn’t core a shale, you got fired.”

Tinker is the Texas state geologist and also professor, Edwin Allday endowed chair in subsurface geology, at the Jackson School of geosciences, University of Texas at Austin.

He’s also a movie star of sorts, having appeared in theatrically released energy related films. The latest is the award-winning “Switch,” which he conceived and guided through the production process.

It’s widely known that the legendary George Mitchell and his company team spent 17 years doggedly pursuing the needed technology to economically produce the now-famous Barnett Shale. Their ultimate success is widely recognized as the harbinger of the current “shale boom.”

The Barnett, along with the Haynesville, Fayetteville and Marcellus shale plays are included in a four-basin study of shale gas reserves funded by the Alfred P. Sloan foundation and conducted by the Bureau of Economic Geology on Tinker’s turf at the University of Texas at Austin.

The study showed that the Barnett itself is an enormous resource with huge potential, even at somewhat low prices.

In the base case using $4 gas, the assessment forecasts a cumulative 44 TCF of recoverable reserves from the Barnett through 2050 based on already-drilled wells and wells to be drilled through 2030.

The Fayetteville assessment, which followed the same methodology as the Barnett, integrating engineering, geology and economics, estimated technically recoverable gas reserves of 38 TCF for the region. Eighteen TCF reportedly will be economically feasible to recover at $4/mcf.

“There’s a lot of natural gas in the world, a lot of shale gas and tight gas here,” Tinker noted. “As a result of this shale evolution, the price of gas in the United States is about $4, but in the rest of the world it’s $10, $12, $16.”

Implications and Considerations

Tinker pondered aloud during his luncheon talk as to how long this still-evolving action will last.

After all, there is plenty of anger in some corners of the United States, and elsewhere around the world, about a number of issues associated with shale drilling. Hydraulic fracturing no doubt is the largest of the perceived threats in the public domain.

A relatively new concern is the now-unusual flaring of natural gas in oil/liquids-rich plays, particularly the Bakken in North Dakota and the Eagle Ford in Texas.

“Flaring gas – didn’t we quit doing that last century?” Tinker asked. “It’s coming at us like a train, and we need to figure out what to do with this gas.

“It’s energy, it’s methane emissions, it’s CO2,” he noted. “We can fix this; there are a lot of options for using this gas.”

There’s a substantial amount of work awaiting, judging from Tinker’s to-do list.

Much of it is environmental-related.

Environmental implications include:

  • Traffic/noise/light.
  • Land.
  • Earthquakes.
  • Water.
  • NORM.
  • Methane and carbon.

He noted that security issues come into play as well – and the two aren’t mutually exclusive.

Regulatory considerations include:

  • Mandatory baseline data.
  • Cement all gas producing zones.
  • Minimize fresh water use on the front end.
  • Full disclosure of chemicals.
  • Handle flowback and produced water (treat and reuse; dispose – characterize for faults).
  • Minimize methane emissions.
  • Minimize surface impact.
  • Horizontals minimize the number of well pads.
Scott Tinker talking about shale proved to be a big draw for the EMD in Houston.
Scott Tinker talking about shale proved to be a big draw for the EMD in Houston.
A Different Conversation?

Amidst all the frequent hubbub of shale-angst emanating from a number of sources is an unspoken, yet profound, basic fact in the overall energy picture.

“Most people don’t know how electricity or gas are made,” Tinker noted. “And they likely don’t care.

“The public is free not to like everything, but this means we must take the energy conversation to a different place,” he said.

“The conversation we need to have is about the things that energy provides to the world,” he emphasized.

Speaking about the world, a question arose from a luncheon attendee: “Do shales stop at the modern coastlines?”

If you get a handle on how to economically drill and develop shale plays offshore, say goodbye to any financial worries you might have.

Comments (0)

 

Division Column-EMD

The Energy Minerals Division (EMD), a division of AAPG, is dedicated to addressing the special concerns of energy resource geologists working with energy resources other than conventional oil and gas, providing a vehicle to keep abreast of the latest developments in the geosciences and associated technology. EMD works in concert with the Division of Environmental Geosciences to serve energy resource and environmental geologists.

View column archives

See Also: Book

Alternative Resources, Structure, Geochemistry and Basin Modeling, Sedimentology and Stratigraphy, Geophysics, Business and Economics, Engineering, Petrophysics and Well Logs, Environmental, Geomechanics and Fracture Analysis, Compressional Systems, Salt Tectonics, Tectonics (General), Extensional Systems, Fold and Thrust Belts, Structural Analysis (Other), Basin Modeling, Source Rock, Migration, Petroleum Systems, Thermal History, Oil Seeps, Oil and Gas Analysis, Maturation, Sequence Stratigraphy, Clastics, Carbonates, Evaporites, Seismic, Gravity, Magnetic, Direct Hydrocarbon Indicators, Resource Estimates, Reserve Estimation, Risk Analysis, Economics, Reservoir Characterization, Development and Operations, Production, Structural Traps, Oil Sands, Oil Shale, Shale Gas, Coalbed Methane, Deep Basin Gas, Diagenetic Traps, Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs, Stratigraphic Traps, Subsalt Traps, Tight Gas Sands, Gas Hydrates, Coal, Uranium (Nuclear), Geothermal, Renewable Energy, Eolian Sandstones, Sheet Sand Deposits, Estuarine Deposits, Fluvial Deltaic Systems, Deep Sea / Deepwater, Lacustrine Deposits, Marine, Regressive Deposits, Transgressive Deposits, Shelf Sand Deposits, Slope, High Stand Deposits, Incised Valley Deposits, Low Stand Deposits, Conventional Sandstones, Deepwater Turbidites, Dolostones, Carbonate Reefs, (Carbonate) Shelf Sand Deposits, Carbonate Platforms, Sebkha, Lacustrine Deposits, Salt, Conventional Drilling, Directional Drilling, Infill Drilling, Coring, Hydraulic Fracturing, Primary Recovery, Secondary Recovery, Water Flooding, Gas Injection, Tertiary Recovery, Chemical Flooding Processes, Thermal Recovery Processes, Miscible Recovery, Microbial Recovery, Drive Mechanisms, Depletion Drive, Water Drive, Ground Water, Hydrology, Reclamation, Remediation, Remote Sensing, Water Resources, Monitoring, Pollution, Natural Resources, Wind Energy, Solar Energy, Hydroelectric Energy, Bioenergy, Hydrogen Energy
Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/book-s64-Heavy-oil-and-Oil-sand-Petroleum-Systems.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 5824 Book

See Also: Bulletin Article

This article reviews the mechanisms of shale gas storage and discusses the major risks or uncertainties for shale gas exploration in China. At a given temperature and pressure, the gas sorption capacities of organic-rich shales are primarily controlled by the organic matter richness but may be significantly influenced by the type and maturity of the organic matter, mineral composition (especially clay content), moisture content, pore volume and structure, resulting in different ratios of gas sorption capacity (GSC) to total organic carbon content for different shales. In laboratory experiments, the GSC of organic-rich shales increases with increasing pressure and decreases with increasing temperature. Under geologic conditions (assuming hydrostatic pressure gradient and constant thermal gradient), the GSC increases initially with depth due to the predominating effect of pressure, passes through a maximum, and then decreases because of the influence of increasing temperature at greater depth. This pattern of variation is quite similar to that observed for coals and is of great significance for understanding the changes in GSC of organic-rich shales over geologic time as a function of burial history. At an elevated temperature and pressure and with the presence of moisture, the gas sorption capacities of organic-rich shales are quite low. As a result, adsorption alone cannot protect sufficient gas for high-maturity organic-rich shales to be commercial gas reservoirs. Two models are proposed to predict the variation of GSC and total gas content over geologic time as a function of burial history. High contents of free gas in organic-rich shales can be preserved in relatively closed systems. Loss of free gas during postgeneration uplift and erosion may result in undersaturation (the total gas contents lower than the sorption capacity) and is the major risk for gas exploration in marine organic-rich shales in China.
Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/mechanisms-of-shale-gas-storage-implications.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 5685 Bulletin Article
Volumetric restoration can provide crucial insights into the structural evolution of three-dimensional (3-D) petroleum systems. A major limitation to its widespread application is the need to include complex architectures and realistic mechanics such as flexural slip. We apply an implicit approach that allows for, including unconformities, thin and/or pinched-out layers in the models but that cannot explicitly localize slip along horizons. To take advantage of this approach while accounting for flexural slip in 3-D restoration, we investigate new geomechanical properties. We consider flexural slip folding as a result of stacked rigid and thin weak layers, which can be modeled using transversely isotropic properties. We compare restorations of an anticline using transversely isotropic properties, isotropic properties, and a stack of rigid isotropic layers with nonfrictional slip between the layers. Our results show that transversely isotropic properties reasonably approximate flexural slip folding. We use these new tools to model the evolution of a complex system located in the Niger Delta toe. The system includes a detachment fold, a fault-bend fold, and a structural wedge formed in series. Growth stratigraphy and erosional surfaces delimit the kinematics of deformation. Regional erosive surfaces, 3-D gradients of fault slip, and vertical variations in mechanical strength motivated the use of our new restoration techniques. Restoring two growth units results not only in reinforcing the interpretation that the area is behaving as a deforming thrust sheet at critical taper, but also in highlighting coeval activity on both the hinterland structures and the toe of the thrust belt.
Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/Handling-natural-complexity-in-three-dimensional.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 3564 Bulletin Article

The Upper Jurassic Arab Formation in the Arabian Peninsula, the most prolific oil-bearing interval of the world, is a succession of interbedded thick carbonates and evaporites that are defined stratigraphically upsection as the Arab-D, Arab-C, Arab-B, and Arab-A. The Arab-D reservoir is the main reservoir in Khurais field, one of the largest onshore oil fields of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

In Khurais field, the Arab-D reservoir is composed of the overlying evaporitic Arab-D Member of the Arab Formation and the underlying upper part of the Jubaila Formation. It contains 11 lithofacies, listed from deepest to shallowest: (1) hardground-capped skeletal wackestone and lime mudstone; (2) intraclast floatstone and rudstone; (3) pelletal wackestone and packstone; (4) stromatoporoid wackestone, packstone, and floatstone; (5) Cladocoropsis wackestone, packstone, and floatstone; (6) Clypeina and Thaumatoporella wackestone and packstone; (7) peloidal packstone and grainstone; (8) ooid grainstone; (9) crypt-microbial laminites; (10) evaporites; and (11) stratigraphically reoccurring dolomite.

The Arab-D reservoir lithofacies succession represents shallowing-upward deposition, which, from deepest to shallowest, reflects the following depositional environments: offshore submarine turbidity fans (lithofacies 1 and 2); lower shoreface settings (lithofacies 3); stromatoporoid reef (lithofacies 4); lagoon (lithofacies 5 and 6); shallow subtidal settings (lithofacies 7 and 8); peritidal settings (lithofacies 9); and sabkhas and salinas (lithofacies 10). The depositional succession of the reservoir represents a prograding, shallow-marine, reef-rimmed carbonate shelf that was subjected to common storm abrasion, which triggered turbidites.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/arabian-carbonate-reservoirs-a-depositional-model.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 3771 Bulletin Article

See Also: Energy Policy Blog

1.3 billion people do not have access to electricity, let alone safe electricity.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/fossil-fuels-and-global-electrification-2014-06jun-09-hero.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 12901 Energy Policy Blog