Seeing Some Good News

My first six months as president of the AAPG Energy Minerals Division has brought both a broader and a more detailed understanding of the energy picture in the United States and the world in general. This has resulted in new realizations and in forming new opinions on a variety of energy-related topics, some of which I would like to share with you.

There is good news in the energy field these days! Why? Because as we emerge from the impact of the blunders on Wall Street, there is a growing sense the American economy has re-engaged and that we are on a new track of sustainable, albeit slow, growth as partners in the international economy.

At the core of this stabilization is the energy industry.

Although much is made in the media of the federal government’s role in the economy, its actual impact is minor. Government funding policies attempt to guide the economy while meeting certain basic requirements of society and to spread funding around the world to further stability and friendship.

As we all can see, this is politically driven, and it is fortunate that it has a small but vociferous impact on the reality of the American and world economy. Just as in stem cell research, the government has the voice but not the pockets of industry to press a program forward.

The same appears to be true in the energy industry. Although energy policy is offered to the federal government from the left and from the right, it’s really the energy industry operating within a reasonably open economy that has the impact on the economy, jobs, other industries, etc.

Unrestrained capitalism, however, needs to be carefully balanced by governmental controls from time to time – but neither too much nor too little.

While the federal government is influenced by political whims, the energy industry is guided by what makes dollars and sense economically and practically. And guess who is found at the core of the energy industry? Not the corporate presidents (and associated management) but the geoscientists (geologists and geophysicists) within the energy industry! The management evaluates the risks and allocates the funding to find and to develop energy for the economic markets of the United States and the world.

Geoscientists must deal with the variety of energy resources, but not all such resources are created equal. Each have price tags, each have environmental impacts. As these issues are weighed and examined, some will remain, some will fade into history, some will be used in new ways.

We are in a transition period of 20-to-30 years from the old ways to the new ways of energy utilization. Over the next few decades, natural gas from a variety of resources and nuclear power will continue to prove their economic and practical value, while geothermal and other hydrocarbon and carbon-based energy resources will contribute in new ways or under special economic circumstances.

To explore for and to develop these resources, the some 36,000 energy geoscientists of the AAPG and its three Divisions (EMD, DPA and DEG) are at the core of the energy industry – and will be needed for the decades to come.

These are interesting times for the current geoscientist. So were the past 100 years for the earlier geoscientists. Guess who still will be involved, mostly through robotics most likely, and who gets to go off-world in the centuries ahead to explore for the needed energy and mineral resources?

You can bet the AAPG still will be supporting the energy geoscientist in a form similar to that coming in April at the AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition in Houston – by providing the new geoscience and technology in one form or another in the meetings of 2111 and beyond.

Comments (0)


Division Column-EMD Michael D. Campbell

Michael D. Campbell, EMD past president (2010-2011) and current chair of the EMD Uranium (Nuclear and Rare Earth) Minerals Committee: Although much is made in the media of the federal government’s role in the economy, its actual impact is minor.

Division Column-EMD

The Energy Minerals Division (EMD), a division of AAPG, is dedicated to addressing the special concerns of energy resource geologists working with energy resources other than conventional oil and gas, providing a vehicle to keep abreast of the latest developments in the geosciences and associated technology. EMD works in concert with the Division of Environmental Geosciences to serve energy resource and environmental geologists.

View column archives

See Also: Book

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 4459 Book

See Also: Bulletin Article

Outcrops of the Cretaceous high-porosity sandstone of the Southeast Basin, France, show two main types of deformation structures: a large number of small-offset, shear-enhanced cataclastic deformation bands (DBs); and a small number of large (meters to decameters)-offset ultracataclastic fault zones. Microstructural analyses of the cataclastic DBs show that fragmentation produces strands of cataclastic fragment-supported matrix, separated by weakly fractured host rock, which cluster to form the DBs. The ultracataclastic fault zones, however, are composed of a matrix-supported ultracataclasite material. Permeability data show that the DBs reduce host-rock permeability by 0.5 to 2 orders of magnitude, whereas the ultracataclasites reduce permeability by approximately 4 orders. Simple calculations considering the structural frequency, thickness, and permeability of these faults suggest that, although the DBs may have an impact on single-phase flow, it is most likely to be less than a 50% reduction in flow rate in extensional contexts, but it may be more severe in the most extreme cases of structural density in tectonic shortening contexts. The larger ultracataclastic faults, however, despite their much lower frequency, will have a more significant reduction in flow rate, probably of approximately 90 to 95%. Hence, although they are commonly at or below the limit of seismic resolution, the detection and/or prediction of such ultracataclastic faults is likely to be more important for single-phase flow problems than DBs (although important two-phase questions remain). The study also suggests that it is inappropriate to use the petrophysical properties of core-scale DB structures as analogs to larger seismic-scale faults.
Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/permeability-and-flow-impact-france.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 3693 Bulletin Article

See Also: Field Seminar

Led by a specialist geologist, experience this trip across the geology of the Amadeus Basin. The trip includes the dramatic Uluru — at both sunrise and sunset — and the indigenous cultural centre, Kings Canyon and luxury camping under the scintillating outback sky at the wilderness lodge. It will travel through the Australian outback to the spectacular geology and landscapes of Ormiston Gorge and Ellery Creek, West MacDonnell Ranges.
Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/FT2-Geotour-in-Central-Australia-hero.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 18991 Field Seminar

See Also: Online e Symposium

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/oc-es-siliclastic-sequence-stratigraphy.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 1469 Online e-Symposium

This work investigates how heterogeneity can be defined and how we can quantify this term by describing a range of statistical heterogeneity (e.g. coefficient of variation and the Lorenz coefficient).

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/oc-es-heterogeneity-in-carbonate-reservoirs.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 1481 Online e-Symposium