Most within territorial limits

Oil Survey Says Arctic Has Riches

The U.S. Geological Survey recently completed an assessment of undiscovered conventional oil and gas resources in all areas north of the Arctic Circle – and the numbers are a bit eye-popping.

In fact, the agency concluded that 90 billion barrels of oil, 1,669 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 44 billion barrels of natural gas liquids may remain in the Arctic, awaiting discovery. 

More than 70 percent of the mean undiscovered oil resource is estimated to occur in five provinces:

  • Arctic Alaska.
  • Amerasia Basin.
  • East Greenland Rift Basins.
  • East Barents Basin.
  • West Greenland-East Canada.

Three provinces are thought to hold more than 70 percent of the undiscovered natural gas:

  • West Siberian Basin.
  • East Barents Basin.
  • Arctic Alaska.

About 84 percent of the entire resource is expected to occur in offshore areas.

It is noteworthy that most of the resource is not under the North Pole but closer to shore in areas that aren’t subject to territorial dispute.

“In our judgment, the undiscovered resources up there are concentrated between the shoreline and the 500 meter contour line,” said AAPG member Don Gautier, USGS geologist and project chief for the agency’s assessment, dubbed the Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal (CARA).

“We would think that most of that is within the 200 nautical mile limit in one way or another,” he said.

Reviewing the Situation

The Arctic Circle encompasses about 6 percent of the earth’s surface, and the extensive Arctic continental shelf region may constitute the largest remaining unexplored prospective hydrocarbon area, geographically speaking.

Arctic Oil Potential
Arctic Oil Potential
More than 400 oil and gas fields already have been discovered north of the Arctic Circle, primarily onshore and in Russia for the most part, Gautier noted. They account for approximately 240 billion barrels of oil and oil-equivalent natural gas.

This approximates 10 percent of the world’s known conventional petroleum resources (cumulative production and remaining proved reserves).

The CARA included only resources determined to be technically recoverable using current technology. Regarding the offshore, the assumption is the resources would be recoverable even in the situation of permanent sea ice and oceanic water depth.

The estimates include no economic considerations. The study results include no reference to exploration and development costs, which would be considerable in this generally harsh environment.

Although any meaningful development of these resources is years away, it is perhaps fortuitous for the United States that the CARA revealed a sizeable amount of the oil resource is off the coast of Alaska, where some offshore drilling already occurs.

“About a third of the undiscovered oil was in the province we call the Arctic Alaska province,” Gautier said. “This includes a lot of area of Chukchi Sea and part of the Beaufort Sea.”

Most of the undiscovered natural gas is thought to be concentrated in the northern part of the western Siberian Basin, Gautier noted.

A major hindrance to Arctic exploration, particularly in the offshore areas, has been the near-permanent sea ice – an obstacle to both seismic data collection and exploratory drilling.

However, the ice cap has melted to some degree – whether permanently or temporarily – which could usher in a whole new era for exploration.

The Northwest Passage, for example, was open all last summer, according to Ron Macnab, Geological Survey of Canada (retired). He noted that for the first time in recorded history, one could have sailed a major ship all the way through the Passage.

A New Approach

Because of the dearth of seismic and drilling data in much of the Arctic, the CARA program differed from the typical USGS resource assessment that relies on discovery process modeling, prospect delineation and deposit simulation.

Instead, the CARA effort relied on a probabilistic methodology of geological analysis and analog modeling. 

Using a newly compiled map of Arctic sedimentary basins, the CARA team defined geologic provinces, each containing more than three kilometers of sedimentary strata, according to Gautier. Assessment units (AU) – mappable volumes of rock with common geologic traits – were identified within each province and quantitatively assessed for petroleum potential.

A world analog database was developed that includes areas accounting for more than 95 percent of the world’s known oil and gas resources outside the United States.

For each AU, the CARA team assessed the probability that a significant oil or gas accumulation was present. Evaluation of the AU probability was based on three geologic elements:

  • Charge (including source rocks and thermal maturity).
  • Rocks (including reservoirs, traps and seals).
  • Timing (including the relative ages of migration and trap formation, as well as preservation).

Each AU was ranked according to its AU probability. The AUs determined to have less than a 10 percent probability of a significant accumulation (recoverable volumes of a minimum 50 million barrels of oil and/or oil equivalent natural gas) were not quantitatively assessed, according to Gautier.

He noted that in addition to the AU probability, the number of accumulations, the size-frequency distribution of accumulations and the relative likelihood of oil versus gas were assessed for each AU and combined by means of a Monte Carlo simulation.

“The probabilistic results reflect the wide range of uncertainty inherent in frontier geological provinces such as those of the Arctic,” Gautier said.

Comments (0)

 

Note from the Editor:

AAPG is planning a “Polar Petroleum Potential” conference focusing on the geology and other issues of Arctic exploration Sept. 28-30, 2009.

The multi-nation program will be held in Moscow, Russia. RosGeo, the Russia geological society, will act as host.

A call for papers will be issued in January. 

Emphasis: International