Updated Seismic Data Needed For OCS

The first seismic surveys of the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) since 1988 could happen in the next two years ­– if the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) finalizes the required environmental impact statement (EIS) in the next few months.

The next step would be for BOEM to issue permits for the seismic surveys and other geological and geophysical activities in support of oil and gas exploration and development, renewable energy and marine minerals in the Mid- and South-Atlantic planning areas.

This process started with nine applications for geophysical surveys submitted from 2005 to 2009, and BOEM’s 2009 announcement of its intent to prepare an EIS.

This is an important step for the future of Atlantic offshore oil and gas production. Unfortunately, the EIS, which was started in 2009, has been sufficiently delayed that seismic data will not be available in 2014, as BOEM starts development of its next five-year OCS leasing plan.

The next five-year plan can consider opening Atlantic offshore tracks to leasing without the seismic data, but seismic surveys and geologic assessments must be completed before there are any lease sales.

The seismic surveys, however, do not assure that the South-, Mid- or North Atlantic OCS areas will be included in the 2017-22 five-year OCS leasing plan or that leasing will occur.

The U.S. Atlantic OCS was under a variety of congressional or executive branch moratoria between 1982 and 2008, which prohibited any geological or geophysical studies. (There also was a six-month moratorium on deepwater drilling instituted in response to the Macondo well blowout.)

Existing Seismic Data

Seismic surveys were conducted in the Atlantic from 1966 to 1988, before the development of 3-D seismic. The publically available Atlantic OCS seismic data includes 11 surveys made up of 1,132 track lines that cover 56,493 kilometers, which are available from the U.S. Geological Survey.

The past moratoria have struck some as illogical when Canada has a thriving Atlantic oil and gas industry. Looking specifically at seismic surveys, Shell completed a large 3-D survey this past summer and fall in deep water about 200 miles off the coast of Nova Scotia.

Recently, a representative of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers reported on Canadian offshore activity to a House Natural Resources Committee, Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources hearing.

Seismic surveys have been conducted offshore Canada for decades, and, as in the United States, Canadian seismic surveys are required to avoid marine mammals and sea turtles and to mitigate impacts to marine organisms and fishing vessels.

Potential Resource Volumes

BOEM released its “Assessment of Undiscovered Technically Recoverable Oil and Gas Resources of the Nation’s Outer Continental Shelf” in 2011. The assessment estimates that 3.3 billion barrels of oil (Bbo) and 31.28 trillion cubic feet (tcf) of gas are in the Atlantic OCS, excluding Florida.

By area, the estimated technically recoverable resources are:

  • North Atlantic – 1.35 Bbo and 9.87 tcf of gas.
  • Mid-Atlantic – 1.42 Bbo and 19.36 tcf of gas.
  • South Atlantic – 0.53 Bbo and 2.04 tcf of gas.

Geophysicists point out that these volumes, based on outdated geophysical and sparse well data, are bound to be exceptionally low.

(The potential for greater resources is suggested by the fact that the Gulf of Mexico resource estimate grew five-fold from 1987 to 2011 assessments, based on improved seismic and drilling.)

Regulators and policy makers, as well as energy developers and consumers, expect to benefit from improved understanding of the resource base.

Environmental Concerns

Many environmental organizations are opposed to allowing seismic surveys in the Atlantic because of potential harm to marine organisms, especially endangered whales and sea turtles.

Others oppose the seismic surveys because they may facilitate future oil and gas drilling and fossil energy consumption.

BOEM reports that it has spent $40 million on research into the impact of seismic surveys on marine life, and has consulted with other regulatory agencies such as the National Marine Fisheries Service to assure the planned surveys comply with the Marine Mammal Protection Act.

The mitigation measures proposed by BOEM would exclude the use of air guns in right whale migration areas from mid-November through mid-April, and in waters near sea turtle nesting areas in Florida during nesting season.

Visual monitoring for marine mammals near the survey vessels would also be required.

Congressional Interest

At the House hearing, a member of the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling stated that opening the Atlantic should be delayed until Congress takes the actions recommended by the Commission to improve offshore safety. An example would be modifying the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to increase liability amounts and provide whistleblower protections.

Congress, however, has no plans to consider legislation on offshore safety regulations.

Members of Congress have introduced several bills that would require BOEM to permit seismic testing in the Atlantic OCS as part of other changes to open the Atlantic OCS to drilling. None of these bills is expected to become law.

Comments (0)

 

Policy Watch

Policy Watch - Edie Allison
Edie Allison began as the Director of the AAPG Geoscience and Energy Office in Washington D.C. in 2012.

Policy Watch

Policy Watch is a monthly column of the EXPLORER written by the director of AAPG's  Geoscience and Energy Office in Washington, D.C. *The first article appeared in February 2006 under the name "Washington Watch" and the column name was changed to "Policy Watch" in January 2013 to broaden the subject matter to a more global view.

View column archives

See Also: Book

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/book-s59-Carbon-Dioxide-Sequestration-in-Geological-Media.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 4441 Book

The volume highlights developments in our understanding of the palaeogeographical, palaeobiological, palaeoclimatic and cryospheric evolution of Antarctica. It focuses on the sedimentary record from the Devonian to the Quaternary Period. It features tectonic evolution and stratigraphy, as well as processes taking place adjacent to, beneath and beyond the ice-sheet margin, including the continental shelf.

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 8359 Book

See Also: Bulletin Article

In this study, seismic models and a Starfak and Tiger Shoal fields data set in the Gulf of Mexico Basin are used to investigate uncertainties caused by the frequency dependence of seismic data and solutions for avoiding pitfalls in seismic-stratigraphic and facies interpretation. Seismic amplitude and instantaneous attributes, along with stratigraphic interpretation of these attributes, are controlled by seismic interference, or tuning, between thin geologic units. Seismic-tuning effects include thickness tuning and frequency tuning, which cause nonlinear variations of reflection amplitude and instantaneous seismic attributes with thickness and/or data frequency. Seismic modeling shows that, whereas thickness tuning determines seismic-interference patterns and, therefore, occurrence of seismic events and seismic facies in layered rock, frequency tuning may further influence the nature of the correlation of seismic data and geologic time and modify seismic facies. Frequency dependence offers a new dimension of seismic data, which has not been fully used in seismic interpretation of geology.

Field-data examples demonstrate that a stratigraphic formation is typically composed of lithofacies of varying thicknesses, and a broadband, stacked seismic data set is not necessarily optimal for stratigraphic and facies interpretation. Although it is difficult to predict correct frequency components for interpretation of not-yet-known geologic targets, local geologic models and well data can be used to optimize the frequency components of seismic data to a certain degree and intentionally modify seismic-interference patterns and seismic facies for better seismic interpretation of geologic surfaces, sediment-dispersal patterns, geomorphology, and sequence stratigraphy.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/frequency-dependent-seismic.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 3609 Bulletin Article

See Also: CD DVD

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 4076 CD-DVD

See Also: Online Certificate Course

Solar Energy Basics is an online course that enables participants to review, analyze, and evaluate opportunities in the rapidly expanding market for solar energy.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/oc-cc-solar-energy-basics.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 1448 Online Certificate Course