Up-Down: Matching VSP, 3-D movements is the key

Welding Geology to Seismic Images

Vertical seismic profiling (VSP) is a measurement procedure in which a seismic sensor is lowered to a sequence of selected depths in a well by wireline, and at each of the downhole receiver stations that sensor then records the downgoing and upgoing seismic wavefields produced by a surface-positioned source (figure 1).

An important concept to understand regarding VSP imaging is that VSP recording geometry causes the stratigraphy at a VSP well – where sequence boundaries are known as a function of depth from well logs and core control – to be welded to the VSP image, which is known as a function of VSP reflection time.

This welded relationship between stratigraphy and a VSP image results because VSP receivers are distributed vertically through geologic image space, allowing both stratigraphic depth and seismic travel time to be known at each downhole receiver station.

This dual-coordinate domain (depth and time) involved in a VSP measurement means that any geologic property known as a function of depth at a VSP well can be accurately positioned on, and rigidly welded to, the time coordinate of the VSP image (figure 1).

The reverse situation also is true; the VSP image can be accurately positioned on, and welded to, the depth coordinate of the stratigraphic column at a VSP well.

This latter option of transforming a VSP image to the stratigraphic depth domain is not done as often, because the usual objective of prospect interpretation is to insert stratigraphy into 3-D seismic data volumes that are defined as functions of seismic image time, not as functions of stratigraphic depth.

A VSP image and a 3-D seismic image often have different time datums, because the images were made by different contractors who used:

  • Different depth datums for the time origin.
  • Different replacement velocities to move source stations to this depth datum.
  • Different illuminating wavelets.

As a result, an interpreter often has to shift a VSP image up or down relative to a 3-D seismic image to determine an optimal match between the two images.

The concept of a welded bond between a VSP image and the stratigraphy at a VSP well means that whenever an interpreter moves a VSP image up, say by 20 ms, to better correlate with a 3-D seismic image, the stratigraphy moves up by the same amount (20 ms) in 3-D seismic image space.

Likewise, if the VSP image has to be moved down to create an optimal waveform character match with the 3-D data, then the straigraphy shifts down by the same amount in the 3-D seismic volume.

The fact that VSP data provide an independent image that can be moved up and down to find an optimal match between VSP and 3-D seismic reflection character is the fundamental property of the VSP-to-seismic calibration technique that establishes the correct time shift between 3-D seismic image time and VSP image time.

When the time shift between the 3-D seismic and VSP images is determined, then the correct time shift between the 3-D seismic image and the stratigraphy at the VSP calibration well is also defined, because that stratigraphy is welded to the VSP image and moves up and down in concert with the VSP image-time axis.

An example of a VSP-based stratigraphic calibration of a 3-D data volume is shown as figure 2. This VSP image is the same one displayed in figure 1 and was produced from a large-offset VSP survey where the source was positioned 600 meters (2,000 feet) from the receiver well.

The fact that stratigraphy is welded to the VSP image, causing stratigraphic interfaces to move up and down in concert with the VSP image during the VSP-to-seismic image calibration process, is what ensures that targeted thin-bed units are positioned in the correct time windows in the 3-D seismic volume when an optimal alignment is established between the VSP and 3-D images.

In figure 2, this VSP-based interpretation procedure leads to the conclusion that although the tops of thin-bed units 19C and 15 are positioned at VSP image times of 1.432 s and 1.333 s, respectively, they have to be inserted into the 3-D data volume 18 ms earlier in image time at 3-D image times of 1.414 s and 1.315, respectively.

Note that this interpretation procedure leads to the conclusion that:

  • Some thin-bed units correlate with peaks in the 3-D volume.
  • Some thin-beds are associated with troughs.
  • Some thin-beds are positioned on zero-crossings of the 3-D wiggle-trace data.

However, for each thin-bed unit we can be sure that we have defined the proper 3-D seismic data window at the VSP calibration well, where seismic attributes can be calculated to study the distribution of each thin-bed reservoir throughout 3-D image space.

Comments (0)


Geophysical Corner

The Geophysical Corner is a regular column in the EXPLORER that features geophysical case studies, techniques and application to the petroleum industry.


Image Gallery

See Also: Book

Alternative Resources, Structure, Geochemistry and Basin Modeling, Sedimentology and Stratigraphy, Geophysics, Business and Economics, Engineering, Petrophysics and Well Logs, Environmental, Geomechanics and Fracture Analysis, Compressional Systems, Salt Tectonics, Tectonics (General), Extensional Systems, Fold and Thrust Belts, Structural Analysis (Other), Basin Modeling, Source Rock, Migration, Petroleum Systems, Thermal History, Oil Seeps, Oil and Gas Analysis, Maturation, Sequence Stratigraphy, Clastics, Carbonates, Evaporites, Seismic, Gravity, Magnetic, Direct Hydrocarbon Indicators, Resource Estimates, Reserve Estimation, Risk Analysis, Economics, Reservoir Characterization, Development and Operations, Production, Structural Traps, Oil Sands, Oil Shale, Shale Gas, Coalbed Methane, Deep Basin Gas, Diagenetic Traps, Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs, Stratigraphic Traps, Subsalt Traps, Tight Gas Sands, Gas Hydrates, Coal, Uranium (Nuclear), Geothermal, Renewable Energy, Eolian Sandstones, Sheet Sand Deposits, Estuarine Deposits, Fluvial Deltaic Systems, Deep Sea / Deepwater, Lacustrine Deposits, Marine, Regressive Deposits, Transgressive Deposits, Shelf Sand Deposits, Slope, High Stand Deposits, Incised Valley Deposits, Low Stand Deposits, Conventional Sandstones, Deepwater Turbidites, Dolostones, Carbonate Reefs, (Carbonate) Shelf Sand Deposits, Carbonate Platforms, Sebkha, Lacustrine Deposits, Salt, Conventional Drilling, Directional Drilling, Infill Drilling, Coring, Hydraulic Fracturing, Primary Recovery, Secondary Recovery, Water Flooding, Gas Injection, Tertiary Recovery, Chemical Flooding Processes, Thermal Recovery Processes, Miscible Recovery, Microbial Recovery, Drive Mechanisms, Depletion Drive, Water Drive, Ground Water, Hydrology, Reclamation, Remediation, Remote Sensing, Water Resources, Monitoring, Pollution, Natural Resources, Wind Energy, Solar Energy, Hydroelectric Energy, Bioenergy, Hydrogen Energy
Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/book-s65-Application-of-Structural-Methods-to-Rocky-Mountain.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 5826 Book

See Also: Bulletin Article

In this study, seismic models and a Starfak and Tiger Shoal fields data set in the Gulf of Mexico Basin are used to investigate uncertainties caused by the frequency dependence of seismic data and solutions for avoiding pitfalls in seismic-stratigraphic and facies interpretation. Seismic amplitude and instantaneous attributes, along with stratigraphic interpretation of these attributes, are controlled by seismic interference, or tuning, between thin geologic units. Seismic-tuning effects include thickness tuning and frequency tuning, which cause nonlinear variations of reflection amplitude and instantaneous seismic attributes with thickness and/or data frequency. Seismic modeling shows that, whereas thickness tuning determines seismic-interference patterns and, therefore, occurrence of seismic events and seismic facies in layered rock, frequency tuning may further influence the nature of the correlation of seismic data and geologic time and modify seismic facies. Frequency dependence offers a new dimension of seismic data, which has not been fully used in seismic interpretation of geology.

Field-data examples demonstrate that a stratigraphic formation is typically composed of lithofacies of varying thicknesses, and a broadband, stacked seismic data set is not necessarily optimal for stratigraphic and facies interpretation. Although it is difficult to predict correct frequency components for interpretation of not-yet-known geologic targets, local geologic models and well data can be used to optimize the frequency components of seismic data to a certain degree and intentionally modify seismic-interference patterns and seismic facies for better seismic interpretation of geologic surfaces, sediment-dispersal patterns, geomorphology, and sequence stratigraphy.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/frequency-dependent-seismic.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 3609 Bulletin Article

See Also: DL Abstract

Carbonate submarine slopes have a tendency to be steeper than their siliciclastic counterparts, an observation that is generally attributed to microbial binding and early cementation in carbonates. However, careful comparison of gross development, curvature, and angle of dip in similar settings shows surprising similarities between siliciclastic and carbonate slopes. This paper presents examples of the various systems from seismic and outcrop and proposes a workflow that facilitates more systematic and improved prediction of carbonate and siliciclastic depositional systems ahead of drill.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/so-different-yet-so-similar-hero.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 11684 DL Abstract

See Also: Hedberg Abstract

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 17141 Hedberg Abstract

See Also: Short Course

This course will focus on practical techniques to investigate and optimize fracture treatments. Participants in this course will have access to more than 200 published field studies in which the productivity and profitability of fields have been improved by altering the treatment design.
Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/ace2015-sc16-frac-engineer-hero.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 14631 Short Course