GEO-DC Office Marks Fifth Year

This month marks the fifth anniversary of the Geoscience and Energy Office in Washington, D.C. (GEO-DC), established by the AAPG Executive Committee in June 2005. We are taking this opportunity to review the purpose, past accomplishments and future plans for the office.

GEO-DC is now a well-regarded and respected entity that provides a host of services to AAPG members and policy makers.

The office is critically important to AAPG members. Concern among members about the lack of a coherent, comprehensive U.S. energy policy is very high. Volatile prices for oil and gas, energy security, energy independence, climate change, tax increases to support a myriad of government programs and many other issues have dominated energy policy debates.

Proposals to award tax incentives to alternative energy are widespread, while plans to eliminate tax incentives for fossil energy threaten the livelihood of both domestic and international AAPG members. One of the six purposes of the Association, as stated in our constitution, is “to advance the professional well being of its members” – and that is precisely what GEO-DC is doing.

There is a disconnect between the oil and gas industry and the American public and the U.S. government.

The narrative in Washington is that Big Oil and its “obscene” profits need to be punished so that the country can move to clean energy as soon as possible. A deliberate move to higher taxes, more regulation, bigger government, redistribution of wealth and suppression of small business is confounding the efforts of geoscientists to explore for new energy sources.

The petroleum industry supplying the global economy’s perceived addiction to oil is under siege on all fronts. The favorite pastime of too many in responsible government positions is to demonize industry and business in general. The evidence suggests that without a change in direction we are headed toward an energy abyss.

What is the solution to this plight?

It is education, education and more education – of science and fact-based information. A grassroots effort is essential, involving every AAPG member. Legislators at all levels of government respond most directly to what they are hearing back home.

AAPG is not a trade association, but rather a scientific and professional association. As such, GEO-DC’s purpose is threefold:

  • Communicate to policy makers and regulators the scientific knowledge and professional expertise of AAPG’s members and inform the policy making process with science.
  • Communicate to AAPG members policy issues of importance and professional interest to them.
  • Equip and train AAPG members to communicate effectively to policy makers and create opportunities for members to engage in the policy process.

The Governance Board is responsible for providing member oversight of the office and its activities. The Division of Professional Affairs (DPA) provides significant programmatic and financial support through the Governmental Affairs Committee (GAC).

GAC is responsible for the development of AAPG statements, which outline the current views of the Association on a host of policy issues. AAPG statements are the principal touchstone for GEO-DC on policy issues. They are developed by GAC based on suggestions from AAPG members, and then forwarded through the Governance Board and DPA leadership to the AAPG Executive Committee for approval and adoption.

The statements are reviewed and updated periodically to reflect new scientific advancements, policy developments or other changes.

Providing information to policy makers is a primary mission. We do that by responding to information requests as they occur. We also look for opportunities to formally engage Congress and the administration on various issues through written/verbal testimony and responses to requests for public comment. Efforts to directly engage lawmakers and their staff through personal meetings are ongoing.

Developing materials to use in our outreach – such as a primer on oil and natural gas exploration and a whitepaper on R&D needs of the U.S. independent oil and gas producer – are ways that AAPG members have made direct contributions to these efforts.

GEO-DC also routinely works with other organizations in Washington, D.C., always seeking to provide scientific and fact-based information based on our members’ knowledge and experience.

GEO-DC hosts Congressional Visits Days twice a year, where geoscientists come to Washington to meet with agencies, congressional committees and individual legislators. We provide speakers and host briefings for Senate and House staff to understand many aspects of energy geology. If any of you (not just DPA members) are interested in contributing your time and effort, please contact us.

Much has been accomplished, but much more work remains to be done.

To plan for GEO-DC’s future, the Governance Board convened a workshop in Washington, D.C., in late 2009. Fifteen projects/issues were considered and prioritized for further development.

The projects include training programs for AAPG members in communicating with policymakers and creating opportunities for members to engage in this activity. We are looking to develop new outreach materials on a variety of topics. And we are constantly looking at ways to provide information and service to AAPG members outside the United States.

Last month the EC approved a proposal from the Governance Board that some of these special projects be funded by members’ voluntary contributions (accumulated to date) made on the annual AAPG dues statement. If you are interested in contributing financially to GEO-DC’s activities, please mark the appropriate box on your dues notice and show the amount of your voluntary contribution.

(These contributions are not deductible for federal income tax purpose and are limited to U.S. members.)

Thanks to all of you who have already provided financial support.

Special thanks are due to Pat Gratton, Pete Rose, Will Green and Clint Moore for their early vision and leadership in the formation of GEO-DC. Also, special thanks to Deborah Sacrey, who serves as chair of the DPA Governmental Affairs Committee, and her predecessor Carl Smith, for their dedication and commitment to the success of the office.

Extra special thanks to GEO-DC director David Curtiss, who has been critical to the ongoing functioning of the office, and to the office’s founding director, Don Juckett.

The stakes are high. The challenge is great. Educating our leaders about what we do has a direct impact on each of us.

We urge you to get involved and join us as we work diligently to bring science to policy.

Comments (0)


Washington Watch

Washington Watch - David Curtiss

David Curtiss served as the Director of AAPG’s Geoscience and Energy Office in Washington, D.C. from 2008-11.

Washington Watch

Washington Watch - Creties Jenkins

Creties Jenkins is a past president of the EMD.

Washington Watch

Washington Watch - Peter MacKenzie

 Peter MacKenzie is vice chair of the Governance Board. 

Washington Watch

Washington Watch - Dan Smith

Dan Smith is chair of the Governance Board.

Policy Watch

Policy Watch is a monthly column of the EXPLORER written by the director of AAPG's  Geoscience and Energy Office in Washington, D.C. *The first article appeared in February 2006 under the name "Washington Watch" and the column name was changed to "Policy Watch" in January 2013 to broaden the subject matter to a more global view.

View column archives

See Also: Bulletin Article

In prospective basins affected by exhumation, uncertainty commonly exists regarding the maximum burial depths of source, reservoir, and seal horizons. One such basin is the Otway Basin, an important gas province in southeastern Australia, which has witnessed several exhumation events. Here, we present estimates of net exhumation magnitudes for 110 onshore and offshore petroleum wells based on the sonic transit time analyses of Lower Cretaceous fluvial shales. Our results show significant post-Albian net exhumation in the eastern onshore Otway Basin (gt1500 m [sim4920 ft]) and a generally minor net exhumation (lt200 m [sim655 ft]) elsewhere in the Otway Basin, consistent with estimates based on thermal history data. The distribution of net exhumation magnitudes in relation to mid-Cretaceous and Neogene compressional structures indicates that exhumation was dominantly controlled by short-wavelength basin inversion driven by plate-boundary forces.

Deeper burial coupled with high geothermal gradients in the onshore eastern Otway Basin and along the northern basin margin during the early Cretaceous have rendered Lower Cretaceous source rocks mostly overmature, with any remaining hydrocarbons from the initial charge likely to be trapped in tightly compacted reservoirs and/or secondary (fracture-related) porosity. However, the embrittlement of these reservoirs during their deeper burial may present opportunities for the development of low-permeability plays through hydraulic fracturing where smectite clay minerals are illitized. Source rocks at near-maximum burial at present day are at temperatures suitable for gas generation, with key controls on prospectivity in these areas including the sealing potential of faulted traps and the relationship between charge and trap development.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/quantifying-Cretaceous-Cenozoic-exhumation-in-the-Otway-Basin.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 3252 Bulletin Article

See Also: CD DVD

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 4576 CD-DVD

See Also: DL Abstract

During the last glacial maximum (LGM), the Antarctic ice sheets expanded, reaching the shelf break in many places, including in the Antarctic Peninsula (AP); since the end of the LGM (~14,000 years ago) ice has retreated back to its current position, leaving a suite of subglacial geomorphic features on the seafloor. Sedimentary archives sequestered in deep fjords have formed under marine conditions, recording the ongoing glacial retreat and climatic fluctuations.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/dl-antarctica-sedementary-antarctic-geologic-marine-geological-hero.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 22913 DL Abstract

In 2010 Senator Bingaman of New Mexico requested that Department of Energy Secretary Steven Chu engage the National Research Council (NRC), the operating arm of the National Academy of Sciences and National Academy of Engineering, to form an ad hoc committee to examine the topic of “Induced Seismicity Potential in Energy Technologies.”

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 3075 DL Abstract

See Also: Online Certificate Course

Renewable & Non-Renewable Resources is an online course that enables participants to review, analyze, and evaluate opportunities in the rapidly expanding market for renewable energy.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/oc-cc-renewable-non-renewable-resources.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 1450 Online Certificate Course