ARPA-E – Not a Typical Research Effort

It should come as no surprise that here at GEO-DC we spend a lot of time talking about energy and the future of energy. Our basic objective is to help people understand that oil and natural gas, which currently comprise nearly 65 percent of U.S. energy, provide the fuel and power needed for economic growth and jobs.

But while fossil fuels are the foundation of global energy – and will remain so for many decades, perhaps longer – we can expect alternative and renewable energy sources will continue to grow in importance. And it is possible that a scientist or inventor will make a technological breakthrough in coming years that transforms the energy sector.

The Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA-E) is looking for that potentially “disruptive” energy technology.


ARPA-E was authorized as an agency within the U.S. Department of Energy in the America COMPETES Act of 2007. But, like many government programs, it was created and received no funding (see January Washington Watch) until passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

The stimulus bill provided $400 million to launch the agency, whose mission is “to fund projects that will develop transformational technologies that reduce America’s dependence on foreign energy imports; reduce U.S. energy-related emissions (including greenhouse gasses); improve energy efficiency across all sectors of the U.S. economy and ensure that the U.S. maintains its leadership in developing and deploying advanced energy technologies.”

But ARPA-E is not meant to be a typical government research effort.

It’s modeled after DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency within the U.S. Department of Defense. DARPA was created in the late 1950s to respond to Soviet technical advances, such as the launch of Sputnik, at the onset of the Cold War.

According to Richard Van Atta of the Institute for Defense Analyses, DARPA has changed and evolved since its founding. It is a highly “agile” organization that is not risk averse, focused on “high-risk, high-reward” research. Its focus is “idea driven and outcome oriented.”

DARPA’s investment strategies more closely resemble those of venture capitalists than traditional government R&D programs. And that is how Energy Secretary Steven Chu, himself a Nobel Prize-winning physicist, describes the goal of ARPA-E in funding high-risk, high-reward research.

Using a baseball analogy he says they’re asking scientists to swing from the heels. Some will strike out. But other scientists will hit home runs and some will hit grand slams.

The research portfolio is broad. Program topics that ARPA-E is funding range from conventional energy and carbon capture to vehicle technologies and biomass energy.

There have been two funding rounds since the agency launched. The first encompassed many forms of energy; the second is more focused. Competition in round one was fierce, with only 1 percent of proposals submitted selected for funding.

Affordable Power From Water and Sunlight is the title of one funded project being conducted by Sun Catalytix Corporation. The firm is using sunlight and a catalyst discovered at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to separate hydrogen and oxygen from either tap water or clean seawater. The science is proven. But ARPA-E funding will enable them to improve performance and develop prototype devices with an eye on commercial deployment.

If successful, the project will deliver an affordable renewable energy storage device that could be used in both off-grid and on-grid installations.

Sunlight and the catalyst split water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen suitable for use in a fuel cell to generate electricity. It is an elegant way to “store” solar energy – if it works as intended and can be deployed as cheaply as expected.


But the path of any new technology is typically bumpy, leading through the dreaded “valley of death,” as it tries to move from successful lab bench prototype to commercially viable product. The benefit of ARPA-E funding over private capital at this stage, according to Sun Catalytix, is that they can focus on improving technology rather than raising additional money.

“Our nation’s history is replete with examples of pioneers and entrepreneurs who took risks, said ARPA-E Director Arun Majumdar. “These innovators often failed initially, but quickly learned from those failures, competed against each other and innovated in both technology and business to create the largest industrial base the world has ever seen.

“ARPA-E’s goal is to tap into this truly American ethos, and to identify and support the pioneers of the future.”

ARPA-E is engaged in a daring enterprise, and more information about the funded projects is available on the agency website.

Comments (0)

 

Washington Watch

Washington Watch - David Curtiss

David Curtiss served as the Director of AAPG’s Geoscience and Energy Office in Washington, D.C. from 2008-11.

Washington Watch

Washington Watch - Creties Jenkins

Creties Jenkins is a past president of the EMD.

Washington Watch

Washington Watch - Peter MacKenzie

 Peter MacKenzie is vice chair of the Governance Board. 

Washington Watch

Washington Watch - Dan Smith

Dan Smith is chair of the Governance Board.

Policy Watch is a monthly column of the EXPLORER written by the director of AAPG's  Geoscience and Energy Office in Washington, D.C. *The first article appeared in February 2006 under the name "Washington Watch" and the column name was changed to "Policy Watch" in January 2013 to broaden the subject matter to a more global view.

View column archives