AAPG Adds Voice to Moratorium Conversation

As oil spilled from the Macondo well into the Gulf of Mexico in the days following the Deepwater Horizon drill rig explosion, the White House scrambled to respond. President Obama ordered the Department of the Interior to conduct a safety review of offshore operations and report back within 30 days. In the interim, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announced the department would not issue new deepwater drilling permits.

The 30-day review, delivered May 27, recommended specific measures to increase safety and enhance oversight of offshore operations. These measures were codified and communicated to industry through two “Notices to Lessees and Operators” (NTL No. 2010-N05 and -N06).

The president simultaneously extended the suspension on deepwater drilling – defined as wells in more than 500 feet of water – until Nov. 30, while the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling investigated.

The move drew criticism from both industry and political leaders.

Hornbeck Offshore Services, which supports deepwater and ultra-deepwater drilling and operations, filed suit against Salazar, alleging “the federal government’s imposition of a general moratorium on deepwater drilling for oil in the Gulf of Mexico was imposed contrary to law.”

“[T]he Court is unable to divine or fathom a relationship between the findings [of the 30-day review] and the immense scope of the moratorium,” wrote Judge Martin Feldman of the U.S. District Court Eastern District of Louisiana in his ruling. The moratorium was not in the public interest, the judge concluded, and granted a preliminary injunction against it.

Many Gulf Coast leaders agreed.

“During one of the most challenging economic periods in decades, the last thing we need is to enact public policies that will certainly destroy thousands of existing jobs while preventing the creation of thousands more,” wrote Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal (R) in a letter to President Obama and Secretary Salazar. He urged enforcement of existing regulations and emphasis on safe operations.

Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-Louisiana) acknowledged there is no risk-free energy production, but called on the administration to implement new drilling practices, such as those suggested in the 30-day review report, rather than issue a blanket moratorium.

“I believe that we can demonstrably improve the safety of deepwater drilling without shutting down the Gulf Coast economy for more than six months,” Landrieu said.

In response to the barrage of criticism, both the White House and the Interior Department indicated willingness to consider an earlier lifting of the drilling suspension.

“I remain open to modifying the new deepwater drilling suspensions based on new information,” said Secretary Salazar, “but industry must raise the bar on its practices and answer fundamental questions about deepwater safety, blowout prevention and containment and oil spill response.”

The administration issued a revised moratorium in July, after Judge Feldman’s ruling, focusing on the technical specifications of the drilling operation rather than water depth. And as part of this process, Secretary Salazar instructed Michael Bromwich, director of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, to conduct fact-finding meetings across the country on offshore safety and best practice.

Independently, the National Commission is also reviewing the use of moratoria. It asked the Bipartisan Policy Center (BPC), a Washington, D.C., think tank, to assist with the assessment.

BPC in turn invited a diverse group of stakeholders to respond to a questionnaire on aspects of offshore exploration, production and safety practices.

AAPG President David Rensink responded on behalf of the Association, providing geological context, discussing how oil and natural gas operators manage risk and uncertainty, and offering AAPG’s view on the use of moratoria.

“An offshore drilling moratorium is a blunt policy tool that is more destructive than beneficial,” Rensink wrote. “Its high cost has been evident this year, as the moratorium imposed in May exacerbated the already substantial economic harm experienced along the Gulf Coast from this tragic event. Consequently, AAPG believes that future federal plans for spill response preparedness should not include the use of moratoria.”

In its report to the National Commission, BPC stated the moratorium gave government and industry opportunity to review and enhance operational and safety practices. The changes initiated after the 30-day review, together with on-going improvements, should be fully implemented and enforced. If done, this “new regime will provide an adequate margin of safety to responsibly allow the resumption of deep water drilling in the Gulf of Mexico,” the report concluded.

As I write this in early September, it is unclear whether the administration will lift the drilling suspension before Nov. 30. But if the moratorium ended tomorrow, what effect would that have?

Would business resume as if nothing happened?

Former Shell President John Hofmeister appeared on Bloomberg Television on Aug. 30 warning that it could be 1-1/2 to 2 years before a new deepwater well is drilled. He fears that early permits will be challenged in court, leaving the judiciary to decide whether drilling will proceed. And the impact of new regulations could have a chilling effect on offshore E&P activity, resulting in decreased Gulf oil production.

Lifting the moratorium is necessary, but only the first step. There are many policy decisions, from permitting and environmental regulations to taxes, needed to ensure robust domestic oil and natural gas production in the Gulf of Mexico.

These decisions ultimately require public acceptance. According to Rasmussen, public support for offshore drilling ranged from 56 percent to 64 percent this summer, with 53 percent of voters supporting deepwater drilling.

That’s good. Our collective challenge is to educate the public and policy makers about what good policy decisions are.

It’s a discussion we need to have.

Comments (0)


Washington Watch

Washington Watch - David Curtiss

David Curtiss served as the Director of AAPG’s Geoscience and Energy Office in Washington, D.C. from 2008-11.

Washington Watch

Washington Watch - Creties Jenkins

Creties Jenkins is a past president of the EMD.

Washington Watch

Washington Watch - Dan Smith

Dan Smith is chair of the Governance Board.

Washington Watch

Washington Watch - Peter MacKenzie

 Peter MacKenzie is vice chair of the Governance Board. 

Policy Watch

Policy Watch is a monthly column of the EXPLORER written by the director of AAPG's  Geoscience and Energy Office in Washington, D.C. *The first article appeared in February 2006 under the name "Washington Watch" and the column name was changed to "Policy Watch" in January 2013 to broaden the subject matter to a more global view.

View column archives

See Also: Book

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 4218 Book
Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/book-m93-shale-techonics-hero.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 3939 Book

See Also: Energy Policy Blog

Addressing energy infrastructure vulnerabilities due to aging, capacity, climate change impacts, and cyder and physical threats.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/quadrennial-energy-review-infrasturcture–public-meetings-and-opportunities-to-comment-2014-04apr-09.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 12893 Energy Policy Blog

See Also: Environmental Geosciences Article

We use sediment ages and mercury (Hg) concentrations to estimate past and future concentrations in the South River, Virginia, where Hg was released between 1930 and 1950 from a manufacturing process related to nylon production. In a previous study, along a 40 km (25 mi) reach, samples were collected from 26 of 54 fine-grained deposits that formed in the lee of large wood obstructions in the channel and analyzed for grain size, Hg concentration, and organic content. We also obtained radiometric dates from six deposits. To create a history that reflects the full concentration distribution (which contains concentrations as high as 900 mg/kg [900 ppm]), here, we treat the deposits as a single reservoir exchanging contaminated sediments with the overlying water column, and assume that the total sediment mass in storage and the distribution of sediment ages are time invariant. We use reservoir theory to reconstruct the annual history of Hg concentration on suspended sediment using data from our previous study and new results presented here. Many different reconstructed histories fit our data. To constrain results, we use information from a well-preserved core (and our estimate of the total mass of Hg stored in 2007) to specify the years associated with the peak concentration of 900 mg/kg. Our results indicate that around 850 kg (1874 lb) of Hg was stored in the deposits between 1955 and 1961, compared to only 80 kg (176 lb) today. Simulations of future Hg remediation suggest that 100-yr timescales will be needed for the South River to remove Hg-contaminated sediments from the channel perimeter through natural processes.
Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/hero-EG-Journal-21-1-2014.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 5780 Environmental Geosciences Article

See Also: Online e Symposium

Upon successful completion of this course, you will be able to describe geomechanics in shale reservoirs and discuss differences between plays.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/oc-es-all-shale-gas-reservoirs-are-not-the-same.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 1461 Online e-Symposium