‘Unfolding’ Yields New Interpretations

Contributors: Kees Rutten

A pair of scissors always sat next to the box of colored pencils on Kees Rutten’s desk, littered with seismic sections, time-to-depth curves and well logs.

The scissors were used to cut up seismic sections and shift the pieces along faults to check correlations and to see the seismic-character variation across faults. One of his successful, scissors-generated well proposals was an oil field trapped laterally against a clay-filled slump scar on a shelf edge in the middle of heavy faulting.

On retirement from Shell, Kees started developing software to replace his scissors. The computer enables him to deal with more complex geology than was possible by shifting rigid pieces of paper. Variation of slip along syn-sedimentary faults and topological problems such as branching faults and crossing faults are now done on a workstation.

Kees uses the terms “unfaulting” and “unfolding” to distinguish his technology from palinspastic restoration technology that is more suitable for structural geological studies.

Kees is passionate about placing his technology in the hands of seismic interpreters and has teamed with Halliburton/Landmark to bring it to the desks of mainstream seismic interpreters under the name “ezValidator.”

The two examples in this article speak for themselves: Both sections are from deltaic areas and exhibit growth faults, branching faults and crossing faults.

Each section has 15 to 50 stacked reservoir sands filled with oil and gas.


♦The first example shows a structure with two large growth faults that are fairly easy to interpret (figure 1). Seismic character is in general continuous across the faults – even in the deeper sector where growth factors are appreciable.

The surprise is in the unfaulted/unfolded section, where there are several black events (yellow arrows) that terminate halfway along the section. These are oil-filled sands that thin dramatically across the section.

This thinning was originally not noticed; it became obvious only after a costly multi-well appraisal campaign.

♦The structure in the second example (figure 2) is complex, and even after numerous wells were drilled, the fault pattern remained uncertain, leading to two blow-outs.

Using unfaulting technology, a fault interpretation was done in several small steps, validating each step during the process. The end result shows the structural interpretation is correct, and that there are subtle truncations (yellow arrows) against intra-formational unconformities in the upper part of the section, which made log correlations difficult during field development.

Originally, the cut-outs caused by these unconformities were interpreted as fault cut-outs.

The unfaulting algorithm is based on elastic deformation. You can think of a beam passing along the seismic profile with one end clamped far away. You press the free end down to mimic the fault throw at a horizon correlation across a fault.

Neither the unfaulting algorithm nor the unfolding algorithm requires information not found in the seismic data being interpreted, but use the faults and horizons that are present in an interpretation. Fault blocks and fault hierarchy are not required. The algorithms are fast and allow seismic data to be moved interactively even with 50 or more faults.

This real-time interaction contrasts with earlier software that required two-to-five days to massage fault blocks on a section and to establish fault hierarchy, with 30 minutes of CPU time needed for each change.

There is an early release of the technology in Landmark's PowerView/ezValidator that can be evaluated. A full release is slated for 2010 in the DecisionSpace Desktop.


Kees lost one leg due to thrombosis on a long flight to Houston five years ago, but is still skiing in the Alps and sailing his legendary flat-bottom boat on the mudflats in the north of Holland.

He is thinking about a new project using an old seismic vibrator source and EM technology to trip land mines left behind in the Balkan states.

Comments (0)

 

Geophysical Corner - Kees Rutten

Kees Rutten, an AAPG member, is with Slokkert Consultancy in Rolde, Netherlands.

Geophysical Corner

The Geophysical Corner is a regular column in the EXPLORER that features geophysical case studies, techniques and application to the petroleum industry.

VIEW COLUMN ARCHIVES

Image Gallery

Spotlight on Geophysical Themes in New Orleans

Several geophysical-themed technical sessions are planned for the upcoming AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition in New Orleans, including:

  • Seismic Interpretation of Faulted Reservoirs: How to Get the Right Answer the First Time (Monday, April 12).
  • Geophysical Integration: A Road May to Exploration Success (posters, Monday, April 12).
  • Innovative Interpretation and Use of Seismic Data (posters, Tuesday, April 13).

See Also: Bulletin Article

This article reviews the mechanisms of shale gas storage and discusses the major risks or uncertainties for shale gas exploration in China. At a given temperature and pressure, the gas sorption capacities of organic-rich shales are primarily controlled by the organic matter richness but may be significantly influenced by the type and maturity of the organic matter, mineral composition (especially clay content), moisture content, pore volume and structure, resulting in different ratios of gas sorption capacity (GSC) to total organic carbon content for different shales. In laboratory experiments, the GSC of organic-rich shales increases with increasing pressure and decreases with increasing temperature. Under geologic conditions (assuming hydrostatic pressure gradient and constant thermal gradient), the GSC increases initially with depth due to the predominating effect of pressure, passes through a maximum, and then decreases because of the influence of increasing temperature at greater depth. This pattern of variation is quite similar to that observed for coals and is of great significance for understanding the changes in GSC of organic-rich shales over geologic time as a function of burial history. At an elevated temperature and pressure and with the presence of moisture, the gas sorption capacities of organic-rich shales are quite low. As a result, adsorption alone cannot protect sufficient gas for high-maturity organic-rich shales to be commercial gas reservoirs. Two models are proposed to predict the variation of GSC and total gas content over geologic time as a function of burial history. High contents of free gas in organic-rich shales can be preserved in relatively closed systems. Loss of free gas during postgeneration uplift and erosion may result in undersaturation (the total gas contents lower than the sorption capacity) and is the major risk for gas exploration in marine organic-rich shales in China.
Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/mechanisms-of-shale-gas-storage-implications.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 5685 Bulletin Article

See Also: CD DVD

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 4563 CD-DVD
Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 4558 CD-DVD

See Also: DL Abstract

Seismic amplitude anomalies have been used for over 40 years to identify and de-risk exploration opportunities with a great degree of success. Beginning in the late 90s, the global industry portfolio of solid amplitude-supported opportunities started to get depleted in many basins. The depletion of high-confidence opportunities resulted in drilling of intrinsically riskier amplitude anomalies leading to significant exploration failures and unexpected outcomes. This paper presents several examples of volume and scenario-based DHI assessment workflows from selected Circum-Atlantic basins, with discussion of underpinning rock properties systems and lessons learned from drilling results.

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 11673 DL Abstract

See Also: Field Seminar

The seminar focuses on the lithologic variations that characterize clastic reservoir facies and on development of models that can be used to predict these variations in the subsurface.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/fs-clas-clastic-reservoir-facies-and-sequence-stratigraphic.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 49 Field Seminar