Quantitative Curvature Analysis: A Case Study

Contributors: Evan Staples, Kurt Marfurt, Ze’ev Reches

Last month in this space we analyzed the relations of fracture patterns and layer curvature in clay models. This month we examine these relations in a central Oklahoma field developed by Pathfinder Exploration, Norman, Okla.

The dolomitized reservoir is 50-100 feet thick within the Hunton Group of Late Ordovician to Early Devonian age.

The data include a 3-D time-migrated seismic survey of about nine square miles, and 15,622 feet cumulative length of image-logs in seven horizontal wells.

The interpreted image logs (figure 1) of all wells revealed 3,971 fractures, as well as bedding surfaces and fault-zones. The majority of the fractures are sub-vertical to vertical, and their strike orientations are plotted with color-coding of our quality ranking (A to D) based on visual quality and continuity (figure 1, left portion).

Fracture density was binned in 55-foot bins, which are half the size of 110-foot 3-D seismic bins, for comparison between fracture density and seismic attributes. We assumed that lithological and thickness variations within the horizontal wellbores are minimal.

The fracture orientations are fairly scattered, yet three major trends can be recognized (figure 1):

  • A scattered ENE-WSW trend in wells 1, 2, 3 and 4.
  • A scattered ESE-WNW trend in wells 5 and 6.
  • A NNE-SSW trend in well 7.

We test the hypothesis that the fractures formed primarily as tensile fractures due to local curvature (see part 1 of this column in the July EXPLORER), and compare their density to the 3-D seismic curvature.

Figure 2 shows a top Hunton horizon slice through the most-positive curvature volume. The horizontal wells are displayed with color-coded fracture density (fracture number/55-foot length).

Figure 2 (left) displays a few areas of good correlation between high fracture density and high most-positive curvature values (yellow arrows). In the next step (figure 2), the strike direction for high curvature values are plotted with color denoting the direction as shown by the time slice.

The general E-W strike directions of the curvatures appear to correspond with the high fracture densities in wells 3–7 (figure 1). Wells 1 and 2 do not cross areas with curvature zones of E-W strike directions.

To further examine the correlations between fractures and the curvature, we used a workflow for azimuthally-limited weighted average of curvature features from the 2010, 80th Annunal International Meeting of the SEG entitled Seismic attribute illumination of Woodford Shale faults and fractures, Arkoma Basin, Oklahoma, by Guo and Marfurt.

Azimuthal intensity is:

[total strike length] / [total area of the search window]

This technique is similar to fracture intensity calculations in part one, but filters curvature strike direction by azimuth.

We calculated azimuthal intensity in 15-degree sections and correlated them to fracture densities in the image-logs; high correlation exists where “r” approaches unity (table 1). For example, the interpreted fractures in well 3 strike 30-90 degrees (figure 1), and we found high correlation between fracture density and the azimuthal intensity at 45 degrees and 75 degrees, which are within the range of the interpreted fractures.

One should note that these high correlations are localized only in areas of high curvature, and do not exist along the entire wellbore. The other wells, excluding #1, exhibited similar behavior of areas with high fracture density and high curvature, and also had high correlation with one or more trends of azimuthal intensity.

In last month’s (part one) compressional clay experiments we found that a critical magnitude of the curvature is needed to generate tensile fractures – and below this critical curvature there was no correlation between curvature and fractures.

We think that a similar situation occurs in the horizontal wells: areas of high correlation between azimuthal intensities and fracture density also show that most-positive curvature values highly correlate with fracture densities.

To identify the critical curvature magnitude in the present 3-D seismic area, we took the areas of high correlation between azimuthal intensity and fracture density in the wells and computed the curvature ranges for each high correlation interval. We then link them to the fracture density range (table 2).

It appears that the critical magnitude of curvature in the study area is between 8.71x10-3 mi-1 and 2.58x10-2 mi-1 as these ranges of curvature correspond to fracture densities > 0.5 (fracture/feet), suggesting that curvature induced most of these fractures.

Outside this curvature range the fracture densities are too low to be clearly correlated to the curvature.

We thus propose that the azimuthal intensity method can help to identify locations where curvature strike orientations in the subsurface appear to be locally related to fracture density

Our main conclusions are:

Curvature calculations in clay models and the subsurface appear to follow similar patterns.

In clay models, a critical value of curvature is needed to initiate fractures. Fracture density rapidly increases with increasing strain until the saturation point is reached and few new fractures are generated.

Indications for similar behavior were observed in our subsurface analysis of image-logs and seismic data.

Azimuthal-intensity by strike orientation is an effective filter to compare curvature orientation to fracture orientation.

In our study, correlations between curvature azimuthal intensity and fracture density indicated areas where curvature and fracture density are also highly correlated.

The curvature attribute can serve as a better proxy for fracture intensity when compared with horizontal image logs.

However, strain is only one component in fracture generation, with thickness and lithology (estimated by vertical logs, two-way travel time thickness, and seismic impedance inversion) also playing important roles.

Acknowledgements: Thanks to Pathfinder Exploration for providing the data used in this project, and to Schlumberger for providing software for this research at the University of Oklahoma.

Comments (0)


Geophysical Corner

Geophysical Corner - Satinder Chopra
Satinder Chopra, award-winning chief geophysicist (reservoir), at Arcis Seismic Solutions, Calgary, Canada, and a past AAPG-SEG Joint Distinguished Lecturer began serving as the editor of the Geophysical Corner column in 2012.

Geophysical Corner

The Geophysical Corner is a regular column in the EXPLORER that features geophysical case studies, techniques and application to the petroleum industry.


Image Gallery

Meet the Authors

Kurt Marfurt
Kurt Marfurt

Evan Staples is with ConocoPhillips in Houston, and Ze’ev Reches and Kurt Marfurt are with the University of Oklahoma in Norman, Okla. All are AAPG members.

See Also: Bulletin Article

We reviewed the tectonostratigraphic evolution of the Jurassic–Cenozoic collision between the North American and the Caribbean plate using more than 30,000 km (18,641 mi) of regional two-dimensional (2-D) academic seismic lines and Deep Sea Drilling Project wells of Leg 77. The main objective is to perform one-dimensional subsidence analysis and 2-D flexural modeling to better understand how the Caribbean collision may have controlled the stratigraphic evolution of the offshore Cuba region.

Five main tectonic phases previously proposed were recognized: (1) Late Triassic–Jurassic rifting between South and North America that led to the formation of the proto-Caribbean plate; this event is interpreted as half grabens controlled by fault family 1 as the east-northeast–south-southwest–striking faults; (2) Middle–Late Jurassic anticlockwise rotation of the Yucatan block and formation of the Gulf of Mexico; this event resulted in north-northwest–south-southeast–striking faults of fault family 2 controlling half-graben structures; (3) Early Cretaceous passive margin development characterized by carbonate sedimentation; sedimentation was controlled by normal subsidence and eustatic changes, and because of high eustatic seas during the Late Cretaceous, the carbonate platform drowned; (4) Late Cretaceous–Paleogene collision between the Caribbean plate, resulting in the Cuban fold and thrust belt province, the foreland basin province, and the platform margin province; the platform margin province represents the submerged paleoforebulge, which was formed as a flexural response to the tectonic load of the Great Arc of the Caribbean during initial Late Cretaceous–Paleocene collision and foreland basin development that was subsequently submerged during the Eocene to the present water depths as the arc tectonic load reached the maximum collision; and (5) Late Cenozoic large deep-sea erosional features and constructional sediment drifts related to the formation of the Oligocene–Holocene Loop Current–Gulf Stream that flows from the northern Caribbean into the Straits of Florida and to the north Atlantic.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/Subsidence-controls-on-foreland-basin.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 3526 Bulletin Article

See Also: CD DVD

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 16537 CD-DVD
Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 3932 CD-DVD

See Also: Field Seminar

This field seminar offers an excellent opportunity for the students to walk on a variety of modern terrigenous clastic depositional systems while observing sedimentary processes, modern sedimentary structures, and numerous trenches illuminating the three-dimensional architecture of each area.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/fs-Modern-Terrigenous-Clastic-Depositional-Systems.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 13368 Field Seminar

See Also: Online Certificate Course

Geothermal Energy Basics is an online course that enables participants to review, analyze, and evaluate opportunities in the rapidly expanding market for geothermal energy.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/oc-cc-geothermal-energy-basics.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 433 Online Certificate Course