AAPG: Doing What We Say We Do

During my formative years I was raised with a consistent and simple theme: Do what I say I will do and do it to the very best of my ability.

Much as I may have wished it wasn’t so true on some occasions, this policy seems to work in virtually all aspects of life and business.

I have the great honor to follow Ted Beaumont as president of AAPG. During his term as president, Ted did exactly what he said he would do: He put the spotlight on getting good geoscience out to our membership and to our society at large.

He often reminded us, “If we deliver good geoscience, most of our other problems will take care of themselves.”

Ted delivered the goods during his watch, and it is my intent to follow his lead as we aim toward our start on a second century of AAPG as the premier petroleum geoscience organization in the world.

AAPG’s primary missions are:

  • Foster scientific research.
  • Advance the science of geology.
  • Promote technology.
  • Inspire high professional conduct.

AAPG has done a great job delivering on these missions, ever since our inception in 1917 – but there always is room to improve.

We have seen radical changes in the ways we gather, analyze and interpret geoscience data; the ways this information is transferred and consumed; and in the ways our profession may be viewed by governmental agencies and by our society.

The exponential technology explosion has made the globe very small indeed – and in order to survive and, we hope, thrive, AAPG must respond to ever more rapidly accelerating changes throughout the world.

This requires focus and efficiency.


Our primary focus will continue to be advancing petroleum geoscience – and in order to achieve optimal efficiency, we will be linking each activity within AAPG to what we say we do.

We will call upon each Region and Section to examine the linkage between their respective missions and what they are actually doing; to determine whether our money spent is directly aimed at these goals, or perhaps toward worthy, but diffusive efforts.

We will call upon each committee within the AAPG governance structure to align its efforts with our strategic goals, and to focus on expenditures, activities and products that link directly to what we say we do.

We will ask each director within AAPG to look at their tasks within the context of our strategic objectives, and to work with their teams toward an ever-better job of proactively capturing and delivering excellent geoscience.

To further enhance our efficiency in delivering our science – and to assure our Association’s future as the baby boomers enter retirement – we have to touch new members.

We will continue looking for ways to extend our outreach to young professionals – many of whom may have been student members but perhaps fell away from AAPG as they graduated and moved into our profession. Whatever their “era” – whether Gen X, Gen Y/Millennials, Gen Z/Plurals or those yet to be named – our intent is to make AAPG their geoscience home.

We must find a way to successfully communicate our “value proposition” to them and to other potential members worldwide.

My international colleagues tell me that our membership application and approval process is a huge deterrent to geoscientists from their countries joining AAPG. To be more efficient at doing what we say we do, we need to be more inclusive.

The AAPG membership is a remarkable group of geoscientists, of excellent professional character, but I would hope that few would call us an exclusionary club.

We will look for ways to make it simpler for new members to join, while still holding to rigorous technical/professional standards.

Finally, the linkage to doing what we say we do will carry through to our budgetary planning process, with three-year business plans that will be directly linked to the strategic goals of AAPG.

Survival is a useful first step in meeting our long-term objectives. We will be working to establish a better financial buffer for AAPG in the event of an industry downturn (we currently have about a nine-month cushion and will be aiming for 12-18 months).


I am looking forward to a great year, and would like to call upon you, the members of AAPG, to please provide your suggestions on how you believe AAPG could better serve you, your Section/Region, our science and society.

Feel free to “ping” me at lkrystinik@aapg.org.

We need your input, wisdom, creativity, energy, scientific contributions, passion, professionalism and volunteerism to help us to do what we say we do!

Comments (0)

 

Presidents Column

President's Column - Lee Krystinik
Lee Krystinik, AAPG President (2013-14), is a principal with Fossil Creek Resources, Arlington, Texas.

President's Column

AAPG Presidents offer thoughts and information about their experiences for the Association. 

VIEW COLUMN ARCHIVES

See Also: Energy Policy Blog

Witnesses stated that BLM policies create unnecessary obstacles to oil and gas activities on federal lands at a recent House Natural Resources, Energy and Mineral Resources subcommittee hearing: “Energy in America: BLM’s Red-Tape Run Around and its Impact on American Energy Production”

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/oil-and-gas-drilling-on-federal-lands-2014-02feb-24.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 12376 Energy Policy Blog

See Also: Environmental Geosciences Article

We use sediment ages and mercury (Hg) concentrations to estimate past and future concentrations in the South River, Virginia, where Hg was released between 1930 and 1950 from a manufacturing process related to nylon production. In a previous study, along a 40 km (25 mi) reach, samples were collected from 26 of 54 fine-grained deposits that formed in the lee of large wood obstructions in the channel and analyzed for grain size, Hg concentration, and organic content. We also obtained radiometric dates from six deposits. To create a history that reflects the full concentration distribution (which contains concentrations as high as 900 mg/kg [900 ppm]), here, we treat the deposits as a single reservoir exchanging contaminated sediments with the overlying water column, and assume that the total sediment mass in storage and the distribution of sediment ages are time invariant. We use reservoir theory to reconstruct the annual history of Hg concentration on suspended sediment using data from our previous study and new results presented here. Many different reconstructed histories fit our data. To constrain results, we use information from a well-preserved core (and our estimate of the total mass of Hg stored in 2007) to specify the years associated with the peak concentration of 900 mg/kg. Our results indicate that around 850 kg (1874 lb) of Hg was stored in the deposits between 1955 and 1961, compared to only 80 kg (176 lb) today. Simulations of future Hg remediation suggest that 100-yr timescales will be needed for the South River to remove Hg-contaminated sediments from the channel perimeter through natural processes.
Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/hero-EG-Journal-21-1-2014.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 5780 Environmental Geosciences Article

See Also: Online e Symposium

Unger Field, discovered in1955, has produced 8.6 million barrels of oil from a thinly (several ft) bedded, locally cherty dolomite containing vuggy and intercrystalline porosity.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/oc-es-new-production-in-oil-fields.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 1488 Online e-Symposium

This presentation discusses one operator’s approach to fully integrate data captured in the Marcellus Shale in order to optimize horizontal well performance.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/oc-es-marcellus-shale-integrating-information-to-optimize.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 1476 Online e-Symposium

See Also: Short Course

This course is a non-numerical introduction to the use of geochemistry and BPSM to better understanding unconventional resources. This course is designed to provide participants with new information on unconventional and sweet spot identification that is not normally available in routine service company courses.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/hero-geochemistry-and-modeling-unconventional-petroleum-systems.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 20059 Short Course