Think About It: New Ideas Equal New Success

Some older members of AAPG may remember when geologists, geophysicists and engineers worked under separate supervision and in separate departments in oil and gas companies. It may be hard for some of you to believe, but in many companies there literally was a geology department, a geophysics department and an engineering department.

Why were the disciplines separated? I really don’t know.

Probably, though, it was due primarily to the conceived value of integrated confidential data. I also suspect unhealthy competition, as well as some misguided mistrust, between the different disciplines contributed to the limited sharing of data within a company. By separating the disciplines access to information was carefully controlled, and only upper level management could see the big picture.

Another reason might be educational background. My dad, who also is a geologist and longtime AAPG member, reminded me that geologists, geophysicists and engineers used to be educated separately.

Physicists were hired to be geophysicists, he said. They generally didn’t have any geological course work. And engineers were not required to take any geological courses before they were hired to be petroleum engineers. As a result, it was natural to separate the disciplines into departments.

One older geologist/friend who worked for a major oil company told me that in his era he had to get special permission to look at seismic (2-D) sections, for which specific security was in place to handle their restricted use by geologists – usually under the watchful eye of a senior geophysicist.

My first job was with Cities Service Oil Company. Geologists, geophysicists and engineers were all in our separate departments, and even when we were all working on the same project we worked separately. We geologists generated prospects; they then were vetted for economics by engineers and “shot-out” seismically by the geophysicists.

While I was working at Cities Service, however, things began to change between geologists and geophysicists. The big catalyst seemed to be the publication in 1977 of AAPG Memoir 26, “Seismic Stratigraphy: Applications to Hydrocarbon Exploration.”

At that point geologists began to realize that seismic sections could show more than anticlines and synclines.

In Memoir 26, Peter Vail and his colleagues at Exxon Production Research postulated that seismic reflections are time synchronous and do not necessarily follow lithologic boundaries.

This controversial statement created much debate between geologists and geophysicists – and forced us to begin a dialog about exactly what seismic reflections represent geologically.

You might think it obvious that the two societies that represent petroleum geologists and geophysicists, AAPG and Society of Exploration Geophysicists (SEG), would get together often and have many joint projects where we could exchange ideas. However, there have been very few.

Those few, however, have been notable.

SEG started in 1930 as Society of Economic Geophysicists. In 1932, they changed the name to Society of Petroleum Geophysicists and became affiliated with AAPG, holding joint meetings with AAPG for more than 20 years.

In 1937, they changed their name to what it has been since then: the Society of Exploration Geophysicists.

In 1972, AAPG and SEG co-published Memoir 16, “Stratigraphic Oil and Gas Fields.” Twenty-four years later, in 1986, AAPG and SEG co-published Memoir 42, “Interpretation of Three Dimensional Seismic Data,” written by AAPG member Alistair Brown. It has been a tremendous success and is now in the seventh edition.

This year SEG and AAPG are joint partners in two potentially very significant new projects:

One, initiated by SEG, is a new journal to be called, INTERPRETATION. As described in the March EXPLORER , SEG and AAPG will share editorial responsibilities and expenses for this publication.

INTERPRETATION will be less technical than SEG’s Journal of Geophysics and more technical, in terms of geophysics, than the AAPG BULLETIN.

The other huge new project was initiated by AAPG through an idea generated by AAPG’s former executive director, Rick Fritz, about a new conference that brings AAPG back together with SEG for the first time for joint involvement in a meeting since the 1950s.

The meeting will be called the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, or URTeC for short.

URTeC, however, is being started not just by SEG and AAPG but also in partnership with the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) – and this new, science-driven event marks the first time all three societies have been in such partnership.

The first URTeC will be held Aug. 12-14 in Denver.

Finally, geologists, geophysicists and engineers are formally getting together to share ideas concerning the exploration for and development of unconventional reservoirs.

Why was URTeC created? It is the understandable product of blending the disciplines for more effective exploration and development of unconventional resource plays. For example, engineers realize that an understanding of geological variation of shale gas reservoirs leads to better completion designs and, therefore, higher initial flow rates and higher EURs.

I sincerely hope all of this is just the beginning. Previous AAPG presidents like Dick Bishop have dreamed of the benefits of inter-society cooperation. One can only imagine what synergism between AAPG, SEG and SPE will create.

At first we were hesitant to trust each other, but we realized the more we combined our skills the better we were at finding oil and gas.

If we all forget our self-interests and work together we only have one place to go – onward and upward!

Comments (0)


President's Column

President's Column - Ted Beaumont

Edward A. "Ted" Beaumont, AAPG President (2012-13), is an independent consultant with Cimarex Energy.

President's Column

AAPG Presidents offer thoughts and information about their experiences for the Association. 


See Also: DL Abstract

It is quite common for reservoir engineers to adjust the geological modelling without recoursing to the geologists by multiplying the porosity, the permeability, the anisotropy (kv/kh), the relative permeabilities, the well factors and many other parameters within their numerical world.

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 3100 DL Abstract

The Guadalupe Mountains (USA) expose shelf to basin cross-sections of the Permian Capitan depositional system along 70 km of depositional strike, providing an excellent outcrop analog for studying the processes that generate early fractures within carbonate platform strata.

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 10302 DL Abstract

Offshore Angola has to date delivered recoverable reserves in excess of 20 billion barrels of oil equivalent. This has been encountered in two distinct play systems: the Upper Cretaceous Pinda carbonates sourced by Lower Creatceous lacustrine mudstones and Tertiary deepwater slope turbidite sands sourced by underlying Upper Cretaceous marine mudstones. An extension of the Girassol play into Block 18 to the south will be used to describe how high quality 3D seismic data coupled with a detailed analysis of rock properties led to an unprecedented 6 successes out of 6 wells in the block, including the giant Plutonio discovery. Industry is turning once more to the carbonate play potential - this time in deepwater. It would seem that the Angola offshore success story is set to continue for some time to come.

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 839 DL Abstract

Seismic correlations and well data confirm that deep-water carbonate beds of Mesozoic age have been found above the shallow allochthonous salt canopy in the northern Gulf of Mexico. These rafts of carbonate strata often overlie equivalent age Mesozoic carbonates in their correct stratigraphic position below the salt canopy.

The origin of keel structures is presently not well understood. As deformation occurs after shallow canopy emplacement, the keels are fairly recent developments geologically. Volumetrically few but intriguing observations suggest possible basement involvement in keel formation.

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 846 DL Abstract

See Also: Industry Meeting

Oil and gas production from shale formations in the United States has transformed the energy landscape and is providing significant benefits to U.S. public in the form of lower energy prices, jobs and energy security. Continued development of this important resource however relies on a clear picture of the environmental impact that drilling, completion and production creates. This workshop and field trip, sponsored by RPSEA and the National Energy Technology Laboratory, present an opportunity for geologists, engineers and field operators in the Rocky Mountain region to explore these issues from the perspectives of the impact on water and air. Primary focus will be technology being developed to better understand and also mitigate these environmental issues. The workshop will be held on August 11 at the Renaissance Hotel at 3801 Quebec Street.

Register for one or both days. $50 for the workshop; max 60, $50 for the field trip; max 40. View the full agenda and register at

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/rpsea-2015-logo.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 21907 Industry Meeting