Pioneer Map Charted Anticlinal Structures

At first glance the structural contour map and the cross section shown here look as if they had been published in the late 1920s by AAPG in the “Structure of Typical American Oil Fields” memoir.

But look closer: These maps are much older – they were prepared and published in Japan in the 1880s, long before the petroleum mining industry started to hire geologists and also before Israel C. White proposed the anticlinal theory.

The authors of those maps and cross section were the American geologist Benjamin Smith Lyman (1835-1920) and his 13 young Japanese colleagues.

At the request of the India government in 1870, Lyman worked for a year as a pioneer field geologist for petroleum mining in the Punjab district, and published a map that probably is the first structural contour map in the world (after E.W. Owen, 1975).

In 1872, immediately after his return from India, Lyman received an invitation from the Japanese government to work for three years in Japan as a geologist surveying coal and oil deposits of the island of Hokkaido.

His first task upon arriving in Japan the following January, before starting survey work, was to select appropriate assistants. The assistants he selected were 13 brilliant Japanese students from a new school established by the Japanese government, and Lyman began by training them extensively in the basics of geology and surveying.

A few months later Lyman and the students departed to begin a field survey in the Hokkaido region in the undeveloped northernmost portion of the Japanese Islands.

During the job and training, the students learned how to use the transit, prismatic compass and barometer, which Lyman had brought from the United States. In their spare time he taught them physics, mathematics and chemistry.

After he completed three years of survey work in the Hokkaido region, Lyman agreed to extend the contract with the Japanese government for an additional three years. On this occasion they studied main island areas, where oil was being produced from hand-dug wells near oil seepages along the western coast of Japan.

They also drew topographic maps at 1/6,000 scale, on which they described the results of their geological survey. Until then such highly precise maps had not been available in Japan.

Map Publication

When his contract expired in July of 1879, Lyman decided to remain in Japan until he could prepare an initial draft of his reports and maps.

After submitting his reports to the Japanese government, Lyman bade farewell to his Japanese disciples and friends and left Japan in December 1880. He arrived at his hometown, Northampton, Mass., May 19, 1881, via Singapore, Calcutta and Paris.

In February 1882, Teiichi Kada, one of Lyman’s Japanese disciples, visited his former teacher with their completed geological contour maps. For this long trip to Massachusetts, Kada gave up his position at the Department of Engineering of Japan.

Though the oil field maps were refined with Lyman’s guidance by the summer, Lyman was aware the Japanese government had no budget to publish their maps. He printed 200 sheets of those maps at his expense and let Kada take them back to Japan. (The figure on page 28 is part of those heartfelt maps.)

The maps show beautiful anticlinal structures drawn at 100 Japanese shaku (approximately 100 feet) contour intervals superimposed on the topographic maps at 10 shaku contour intervals. This method of expression is almost the same as the prospect maps we make today.

It is amazing that such maps were published five years prior to I.C. White’s “Anticlinal Theory;” those oil field structural maps were probably the second most important work of Lyman after his assignment in the Punjab district in India, and are some of the oldest subsurface structural contour maps in the world.

They were the fruit of Lyman’s and his disciples’ ardor, commitment and strong sense of responsibility.

The Anticlinal Theory

After Lyman’s departure from Japan, most of his disciples held positions in the coal mining industry and continued to apply the subsurface contouring methodology they had learned with Lyman in their coal work. Several years passed, and nobody took any notice of Lyman’s oil field maps.

In 1888 an oil corporation was established in Japan, and that company acquired a petroleum lease at offshore Amase area in Niigata Prefecture (approximately 250 kilometers northwest of Tokyo, along the Sea of Japan coast). A wildcat was drilled in 1890 from an artificial island built on an oil-seeped inter-tidal zone using a cable tool rig imported from the United States.

This first well was successfully completed and confirmed oil production in the Amase oil field.

This tale of success is the origin for Nippon Oil, the first Japanese petroleum company.

Unfortunately, the still-primitive Japanese petroleum industry hired few of Lyman’s disciples, who might have led basic methodology for petroleum exploration. This means that Nippon Oil’s success had not been done directly using Lyman team’s advanced techniques.

However, we recognize that the luckily successful wildcat was located on the axis of the anticline on Lyman’s contour map – and unexpectedly proved the anticlinal theory.

Nevertheless, Lyman criticized the anticlinal theory all in his life. Perhaps he was strongly affected by J.P. Lesly, who not only was Lyman’s uncle but also his teacher. Lyman wrote to Eijiro Sagawa, a Japanese geologist who visited him in 1911:

“It appears evident that the anticlinal theory is yet very far from having become thoroughly established as the simple and principal guide of the position of the oil pools.”

However, Lyman’s petroleum exploration methodology, which incorporates surface and subsurface structural elements, is still widely applied.

Today a tiny and forsaken petroleum memorial is all that rests on the location of the Amase discovery, Japan’s first oil-producing area.

Comments (0)


Historical Highlights

Historical Highlights - Naomoto Komatsu

Naomoto Komatsu, former executive vice president of Teikoku Oil Co. Ltd. (currently INPEX Corp.) and former vice president of the Geological Society of Japan, discovered the Minami Nagaoka gas field as Teikoku’s as exploration manager in 1979. His achievement was published as the special paper of World Petroleum Congress in 1983. In 1960 he worked with the discovery well of the Khafji oil field in the Persian Gulf.

Historical Highlights

Historical Highlights - Hans Krause

Hans Krause is an AAPG Honorary Member, Distinguished Service Award winner and former chair of the AAPG History of Petroleum Geology Committee.

Historical Highlights

A History-Based Series, Historical Highlights is an ongoing EXPLORER series that celebrates the "eureka" moments of petroleum geology, the rise of key concepts, the discoveries that made a difference, the perseverance and ingenuity of our colleagues – and/or their luck! – through stories that emphasize the anecdotes, the good yarns and the human interest side of our E&P profession. If you have such a story – and who doesn't? – and you'd like to share it with your fellow AAPG members, contact the editor.

View column archives

Image Gallery

See Also: Book

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/book-m97-Shale-Reservoirs-Giant-Resources-21st-Century.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 4016 Book

See Also: Bulletin Article

Size fractions (<4 and 0.4–1.0 μ) of Brent Group sandstones from the northern North Sea contain mostly illite-smectite mixed layers with kaolinite, whereas the same size fractions of Fulmar Formation sandstones from the south-central North Sea consist of illite-smectite mixed layers with minor chlorite. Transmission electron microscope observations show elongated illite laths or agglomerates consisting of small laths when larger individual laths are lacking.

The K-Ar data of the fractions less than 0.4 μm of Brent Group samples plot on two arrays in a 40Ar/36Ar vs. 40K/36Ar diagram that have isochron characteristics with ages of 76.5 ± 4.2 and 40.0 ± 1.5 Ma, and initial 40Ar/36Ar ratios of 253 ± 16 and 301 ± 18, respectively. For the Fulmar Formation samples, the data points of the fractions less than 0.2 and less than 0.4 μ also fit two isochrons with ages of 76.6 ± 1.4 and 47.9 ± 0.5 Ma and initial 40Ar/36Ar ratios of 359 ± 52 and 304 ± 2, respectively. Some of the coarser 0.4–1.0-μ fractions also plot on the two isochrons, but most plot above indicating the presence of detrital components more than 0.4 μ. The almost identical ages obtained from illite-type crystals of sandstones with different deposition ages that are located about 600 km (373 mi) apart record two simultaneous illitization episodes. These events were not induced by local burial conditions, but are related to episodic pressure and/or temperature increases in the studied reservoirs, probably induced by hydrocarbon injection. This interpretation is indirectly supported by notably different K-Ar illite ages from cores of a nearby reservoir at hydrostatic pressure.

Illite is not as well crystallized as expected for potential crystallization temperatures above 160°C measured by fluid-inclusion determinations. In both the northern and south-central North Sea, the two illite generations remain unaffected after crystallization despite continued burial, suggesting notably higher crystallization temperatures than those estimated from geothermal gradients. No recent illite crystallization or alteration is recorded in the K-Ar ages, despite a dramatic regional acceleration of the subsidence in the southern North Sea. ±

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/episodic-and-simultanneous-illitization-in-oil.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 5724 Bulletin Article

See Also: CD DVD

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 4398 CD-DVD

See Also: DL Abstract

The Gulf of Mexico (GOM) is the 9th largest body of water on earth, covering an area of approximately 1.6 million km2 with water depths reaching 4,400 m (14,300’). The basin formed as a result of crustal extension during the early Mesozoic breakup of Pangaea. Rifting occurred from the Late Triassic to early Middle Jurassic. Continued extension through the Middle Jurassic combined with counter-clockwise rotation of crustal blocks away from North America produced highly extended continental crust in the subsiding basin center. Subsidence eventually allowed oceanic water to enter from the west leading to thick, widespread, evaporite deposition. Seafloor spreading initiated in the Late Jurassic eventually splitting the evaporite deposits into northern (USA) and southern (Mexican) basins. Recent work suggests that this may have been accomplished by asymmetric extension, crustal delamination, and exposure of the lower crust or upper mantle rather than true sea floor spreading (or it could be some combination of the two).
Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 844 DL Abstract

See Also: Energy Policy Blog

The U.S. Energy Information Administration reports that Europe consumed 18.7 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of natural gas in 2013; Russia supplied 30% (5.7 Tcf) of this volume, and 16% (3.0 Tcf) of the total natural gas consumed in Europe passed through Ukraine’s pipeline network; Slovakia gets 80 percent of its gas, and Bulgaria gets 90 percent of its gas from Russia via pipeline through Ukraine.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/the-ukraine-crisis-and-european-natural-gas-supplies-2014-07jul-09-hero.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 12905 Energy Policy Blog