AAPG’s Growing, Evolving Reach Continues

As AAPG approaches its 100th anniversary in 2017, I wonder what the founders would think of AAPG now.

AAPG started when 122 men – most of them middle class, still in their 20s and educated at Midwestern or Eastern colleges – formed a group dedicated to the budding science of petroleum geology.

They thought in local terms – the group’s original name was the Southwestern Association of Petroleum Geologists – but a year or so later the young geologists already dared to dream big enough to add “American” to the moniker.

Today, AAPG has more than 36,000 members in 126 countries. Thirty-nine percent of AAPG members are non-U.S. residents – and the percentage is growing.

That growing non-U.S. contingent is a good thing and a natural part of the evolution of AAPG and our industry.

Around the world there is growing and recognizable enthusiasm for AAPG as evidenced by attendance and participation at AAPG-sponsored events like the International Conference and Exhibitions (ICE) or Geoscience Technology Workshops (GTWs).

This year, AAPG ICE was in Singapore, and the conference was a big success with over 2,100 attendees from 62 countries. Student attendees came from all parts of Southeast Asia, and their passion for AAPG was contagious and heartwarming.

I wish all the gray-headed members such as myself could interact with the Southeast Asian students to experience their excitement. They made me realize how important AAPG is to the international community. AAPG truly is an international organization.

Specifically, AAPG has six regions:

  • Africa.
  • Asia-Pacific.
  • Canada.
  • Europe.
  • Latin America.
  • Middle East.

We currently have offices in London, Dubai and Singapore, with staff and volunteers working diligently to deliver products and services to our members. For example, this year the AAPG Europe Region is hosting a Regional conference in Barcelona, Spain. And we’re carefully evaluating where investments in additional offices can further extend the reach of AAPG.

As you probably know by now, the Latin America Region is host for the 2013 ICE, which will be held Sept. 8-11 in Cartagena, Colombia – the jewel of Colombia’s Caribbean coast. Under the leadership of Victor Vega, the conference chair; Miguel Ramirez, Region president; and Victor Ramirez, Region president-elect, the 2013 ICE promises to be among the best ever.

As a result of activities like GTWs and the coming 2013 ICE, AAPG has become a catalyst for improving communication in Latin America. Countries that were inactive until recently are now actively participating in AAPG Latin America Region events. New relationships are developing between people, countries and companies – and even more interaction will occur as a result.

It is all very exciting and gratifying to see AAPG grow and lead the international petroleum geologic community. It must be similar to the excitement the founders of AAPG felt when they realized that the early association would be bigger than the one they first envisaged – one that just focused on the petroleum geology of the southwestern United States.

AAPG’s founders must have been excited to see the enthusiasm of geologists from all over the United States for starting a new association. That’s when they knew, nearly a century ago, that the name had to be changed to the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, to reflect the potential and possibilities that were rapidly emerging.

At some point in the not too distant future, it looks like the American Association of Petroleum Geologists may need to embrace this exciting global enthusiasm and face a similar decision.

Comments (0)


President's Column

President's Column - Ted Beaumont

Edward A. "Ted" Beaumont, AAPG President (2012-13), is an independent consultant with Cimarex Energy.

President's Column

AAPG Presidents offer thoughts and information about their experiences for the Association. 


See Also: DL Abstract

Seismic correlations and well data confirm that deep-water carbonate beds of Mesozoic age have been found above the shallow allochthonous salt canopy in the northern Gulf of Mexico. These rafts of carbonate strata often overlie equivalent age Mesozoic carbonates in their correct stratigraphic position below the salt canopy.

The origin of keel structures is presently not well understood. As deformation occurs after shallow canopy emplacement, the keels are fairly recent developments geologically. Volumetrically few but intriguing observations suggest possible basement involvement in keel formation.

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 846 DL Abstract

The results of regional deep seismic acquisition in the South Atlantic continental margins have shed new lights on the birth and development of sedimentary basins formed during the Gondwana breakup. Recent models of mantle exhumation as observed in the deep water Iberian margin have been applied extensively to the interpretation of several basins in the Eastern Brazilian and West African conjugate margins. However, the tectonic development of these basins is markedly different from the magma-poor margins, and in this lecture we emphasize the contrasts from the tectono-sedimentary features imaged in deep-penetrating seismic profiles that extend from the platform towards the oceanic crust, which indicate that the Red Sea constitutes a better analogue for the birth of divergent continental margins.

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 3088 DL Abstract

Using examples from shale reservoirs worldwide, I demonstrate the diversity of shale-hosted fracture systems and present evidence for how and why various fractures systems form. Core and outcrop observations, strength tests on shale and on fractures in core, and geomechanical models allow prediction of fracture patterns and attributes that can be taken into account in well placement and hydraulic fracture treatment design. Both open and sealed fractures can interact with and modify hydraulic fracture size and shape. Open fractures can enhance reservoir permeability but may conduct treatment fluids great distances, in some instances possibly aseismically.

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 3082 DL Abstract

Natural fractures are a prominent and dramatic feature of many outcrops and are commonly observed in core, where they govern subsurface fluid flow and rock strength. Examples from more than 20 fractured reservoirs show a wide range of fracture sizes and patterns of spatial organization. These patterns can be understood in terms of geochemical and mechanical processes across a range of scales. Fractures in core show pervasive evidence of geochemical reactions; more than is typical of fractures in many outcrops. Accounting for geochemistry and size and size-arrangement and their interactions leads to better predictions of fluid flow.

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 3083 DL Abstract
The Gulf of Mexico (GOM) is the 9th largest body of water on earth, covering an area of approximately 1.6 million km2 with water depths reaching 4,400 m (14,300’). The basin formed as a result of crustal extension during the early Mesozoic breakup of Pangaea. Rifting occurred from the Late Triassic to early Middle Jurassic. Continued extension through the Middle Jurassic combined with counter-clockwise rotation of crustal blocks away from North America produced highly extended continental crust in the subsiding basin center. Subsidence eventually allowed oceanic water to enter from the west leading to thick, widespread, evaporite deposition. Seafloor spreading initiated in the Late Jurassic eventually splitting the evaporite deposits into northern (USA) and southern (Mexican) basins. Recent work suggests that this may have been accomplished by asymmetric extension, crustal delamination, and exposure of the lower crust or upper mantle rather than true sea floor spreading (or it could be some combination of the two).
Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 844 DL Abstract