An Eroding Competitiveness …

In 2005 the National Academies released a report titled “Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future.”

The report’s objective, with the bipartisan encouragement of a concerned Congress, was to assess the nation’s scientific and technological enterprise and recommend specific policy steps to ensure that it would continue delivering the advances necessary to ensure U.S. competitiveness and prosperity.

To conduct the study the National Academies formed the Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century: An Agenda for American Science and Technology, chaired by retired Lockheed Martin Chairman and CEO Norman Augustine.

That committee of 20 academic and industry leaders included Defense Secretary Robert Gates, then-president of Texas A&M University; Energy Secretary Steven Chu, then-director of the E.O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; and Lee R. Raymond, then-chairman and CEO of ExxonMobil Corporation.

Congress responded in 2007 with the America COMPETES legislation to boost national science and technology R&D and education investments through fiscal year 2010.

The bill authorized a “hydrocarbon systems science talent expansion program for institutions of higher education.” Hydrocarbon systems science was defined as “a science involving natural gas or other petroleum exploration, development, or production.” And the goal of the program was to provide money to academic departments and students engaged in these activities.

The authorized funding amounts were not lavish. Even so, Congress never appropriated money to launch the program.

(See the January 2010 edition of this column for a review of the relationship between authorization and appropriation bills.)

Just before this past Christmas, the 111th Congress reauthorized America COMPETES, sending it to President Obama for signature.

Of particular interest to many science societies is a requirement in the reauthorized bill for the National Science and Technology Council to form a working group of federal science agencies to develop policies on the “dissemination and long-term stewardship” of data and information, including peer-reviewed articles, funded by federal money.

There is a strong desire in Washington, D.C., for federally funded research results to be broadly available to the general public. Such a move, however, could dramatically alter the business models used by both for-profit and not-for-profit science publishers – and AAPG is monitoring this process as it unfolds.

The reauthorization continues the hydrocarbon systems science program, expanding the focus areas to include “hydrocarbon spill response and remediation.” It authorizes more than $30 million to be spent over three years. But it is uncertain whether appropriations will follow.

Also in 2010, members of the Rising Above the Gathering Storm Committee updated their report, observing that U.S. competitiveness had further eroded in the five years since its release. The committee’s bleak conclusion was that “[T]he Gathering Storm increasingly appears to be a Category 5.”


“Crisis really is the best word for this situation,” AAPG member Bo Sears said about the critical helium-3 shortage in the United States in an October 2010 EXPLORER article.

The bulk of helium-3 is used for security technology, according to the article, but also has research and medical applications and is a vital component of some well logging tools used in oil and natural gas production. As such, the shortage could impact the U.S. oil and natural gas industry.

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) manages the nation’s helium-3 stockpile, and DOE’s office of oil and natural gas is responsible for allocating the 1,000 liters of helium-3 available for oil and natural gas uses in the current federal fiscal year (FY2011) – and is trying to better understand needs in FY2012.

To do so it is reaching out to the oil and natural gas community, inviting public comments and input.

In a December 7 notice published in the Federal Register, DOE asked for “information to improve its understanding of the need for helium-3 and the diversity of the user community so that it can tailor its allocation process to best support the efficient domestic production of oil and natural gas.”

Specifically, the DOE is looking for information on:

  • Uses of helium-3 in the well logging industry.
  • Volumes of helium-3 needed over the next two years.
  • The ability to recycle and reclaim helium-3 from neutron detectors no longer in use.
  • What quantity of a company’s helium-3 allocation would be used outside the United States.

Submit comments by e-mail to Edith Allison (coincidentally, an AAPG member) with “Helium-3 Request for Comments” in the subject line.

The official deadline to submit public comments was February 1, but DOE has indicated willingness to accept comments through February 15. I urge you to respond to this request to help DOE better understand the industry’s helium-3 needs.

Comments (0)

 

Washington Watch

Washington Watch - David Curtiss

David Curtiss served as the Director of AAPG’s Geoscience and Energy Office in Washington, D.C. from 2008-11.

Washington Watch

Washington Watch - Creties Jenkins

Creties Jenkins is a past president of the EMD.

Washington Watch

Washington Watch - Peter MacKenzie

 Peter MacKenzie is vice chair of the Governance Board. 

Washington Watch

Washington Watch - Dan Smith

Dan Smith is chair of the Governance Board.

Policy Watch

Policy Watch is a monthly column of the EXPLORER written by the director of AAPG's  Geoscience and Energy Office in Washington, D.C. *The first article appeared in February 2006 under the name "Washington Watch" and the column name was changed to "Policy Watch" in January 2013 to broaden the subject matter to a more global view.

View column archives

See Also: Book

Carbonate reservoirs contain an increasingly important percentage of the world's hydrocarbon reserves. This volume presents key recent advances in carbonate exploration and reservoir analysis.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/ws-Carbonate-Reservoirs-of-the-Middle-East-hero.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 4080 Book

See Also: Bulletin Article

Isolated carbonate buildups (ICBs) are commonly attractive exploration targets. However, identifying ICBs based only on seismic data can be difficult for a variety of reasons. These include poor-quality two-dimensional data and a basic similarity between ICBs and other features such as volcanoes, erosional remnants, and tilted fault blocks. To address these difficulties and develop reliable methods to identify ICBs, 234 seismic images were analyzed. The images included proven ICBs and other features, such as folds, volcanoes, and basement highs, which may appear similar to ICBs when imaged in seismic data. From this analysis, 18 identification criteria were derived to distinguish ICBs from non-ICB features. These criteria can be grouped into four categories: regional constraints, analysis of basic seismic geometries, analysis of geophysical details, and finer-scale seismic geometries. Systematically assessing the criteria is useful because it requires critical evaluation of the evidence present in the available data, working from the large-scale regional geology to the fine details of seismic response. It is also useful to summarize the criteria as a numerical score to facilitate comparison between different examples and different classes of ICBs and non-ICBs. Our analysis of scores of different classes of features suggests that the criteria do have some discriminatory power, but significant challenges remain.
Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/methods-for-identification-of-isolated-carbonate.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 3767 Bulletin Article

In reservoir engineering, hydrodynamic properties can be estimated from downhole electrical data using heuristic models (e.g., Archie and Kozeny-Carman's equations) relating electrical conductivity to porosity and permeability. Although proven to be predictive for many sandstone reservoirs, the models mostly fail when applied to carbonate reservoirs that generally display extremely complex pore network structures.

In this article, we investigate the control of the three-dimensional (3-D) geometry and morphology of the pore network on the electrical and flow properties, comparing core-scale laboratory measurements and 3-D x-ray microtomography image analysis of samples from a Miocene reefal carbonate platform located in Mallorca (Spain).

The results show that micrometer- to centimeter-scale heterogeneities strongly influence the measured macroscopic physical parameters that are then used to evaluate the hydrodynamic properties of the rock, and therefore, existing models might not provide accurate descriptions because these heterogeneities occur at scales smaller than those of the integration volume of the borehole geophysical methods. However, associated with specific data processing, 3-D imagery techniques are a useful and probably unique mean to characterize the rock heterogeneity and, thus, the properties variability.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/electrical-and-flow-properties-of-highly-heterogeneous-carbonate-rocks.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 3251 Bulletin Article

See Also: CD DVD

Giant Oil and Gas Fields of the Decade: 1990-1999 is the fourth of a four-decade series of Memoirs commemorating important giant discoveries. This title presents major trends that characterized giant-field discoveries in the 1990s and includes tectonic and sedimentary-basin maps.

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 10483 CD-DVD

See Also: Online Traditional Course

This course will help you turn challenges into opportunities as you learn to strategically manage technological innovation, financial turmoil, a changing workforce, unpredictable social media, and tight deadlines.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/oc-toc-leadership-and-strategic-thinking-in-the-oil-gas-industry.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 1487 Online Traditional Course