Seeing Some Good News

My first six months as president of the AAPG Energy Minerals Division has brought both a broader and a more detailed understanding of the energy picture in the United States and the world in general. This has resulted in new realizations and in forming new opinions on a variety of energy-related topics, some of which I would like to share with you.


There is good news in the energy field these days! Why? Because as we emerge from the impact of the blunders on Wall Street, there is a growing sense the American economy has re-engaged and that we are on a new track of sustainable, albeit slow, growth as partners in the international economy.

At the core of this stabilization is the energy industry.

Although much is made in the media of the federal government’s role in the economy, its actual impact is minor. Government funding policies attempt to guide the economy while meeting certain basic requirements of society and to spread funding around the world to further stability and friendship.

As we all can see, this is politically driven, and it is fortunate that it has a small but vociferous impact on the reality of the American and world economy. Just as in stem cell research, the government has the voice but not the pockets of industry to press a program forward.

The same appears to be true in the energy industry. Although energy policy is offered to the federal government from the left and from the right, it’s really the energy industry operating within a reasonably open economy that has the impact on the economy, jobs, other industries, etc.

Unrestrained capitalism, however, needs to be carefully balanced by governmental controls from time to time – but neither too much nor too little.

While the federal government is influenced by political whims, the energy industry is guided by what makes dollars and sense economically and practically. And guess who is found at the core of the energy industry? Not the corporate presidents (and associated management) but the geoscientists (geologists and geophysicists) within the energy industry! The management evaluates the risks and allocates the funding to find and to develop energy for the economic markets of the United States and the world.

Geoscientists must deal with the variety of energy resources, but not all such resources are created equal. Each have price tags, each have environmental impacts. As these issues are weighed and examined, some will remain, some will fade into history, some will be used in new ways.

We are in a transition period of 20-to-30 years from the old ways to the new ways of energy utilization. Over the next few decades, natural gas from a variety of resources and nuclear power will continue to prove their economic and practical value, while geothermal and other hydrocarbon and carbon-based energy resources will contribute in new ways or under special economic circumstances.

To explore for and to develop these resources, the some 36,000 energy geoscientists of the AAPG and its three Divisions (EMD, DPA and DEG) are at the core of the energy industry – and will be needed for the decades to come.


These are interesting times for the current geoscientist. So were the past 100 years for the earlier geoscientists. Guess who still will be involved, mostly through robotics most likely, and who gets to go off-world in the centuries ahead to explore for the needed energy and mineral resources?

You can bet the AAPG still will be supporting the energy geoscientist in a form similar to that coming in April at the AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition in Houston – by providing the new geoscience and technology in one form or another in the meetings of 2111 and beyond.

Comments (0)

 

Division Column-EMD Michael D. Campbell

Michael D. Campbell, EMD past president (2010-2011) and current chair of the EMD Uranium (Nuclear and Rare Earth) Minerals Committee: Although much is made in the media of the federal government’s role in the economy, its actual impact is minor.

Division Column-EMD

The Energy Minerals Division (EMD), a division of AAPG, is dedicated to addressing the special concerns of energy resource geologists working with energy resources other than conventional oil and gas, providing a vehicle to keep abreast of the latest developments in the geosciences and associated technology. EMD works in concert with the Division of Environmental Geosciences to serve energy resource and environmental geologists.

View column archives

See Also: Book

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 10480 Book

See Also: Bulletin Article

Organic-carbon–rich shales of the lower Marcellus Formation were deposited at the toe and basinward of a prograding clinothem associated with a Mahantango Formation delta complex centered near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Distribution of these organic-carbon–rich shales was influenced by shifts in the delta complex driven by changes in rates of accommodation creation and by a topographically high carbonate bank that formed along the Findlay-Algonquin arch during deposition of the Onondaga Formation. Specifically, we interpret the Union Springs member (Shamokin Member of the Marcellus Formation) and the Onondaga Formation as comprising a single third-order depositional sequence. The Onondaga Formation was deposited in the lowstand to transgressive systems tract, and the Union Springs member was deposited in the transgressive, highstand, and falling-stage systems tract. The regional extent of parasequences, systems tracts, and the interpreted depositional sequence suggest that base-level fluctuations were primarily caused by allogenic forcing—eustasy, climate, or regional thermal uplift or subsidence—instead of basement fault reactivation as argued by previous workers. Paleowater depths in the region of Marcellus Formation black mudrock accumulation were at least 330 ft (100 m) as estimated by differences in strata thickness between the northwestern carbonate bank and basinal facies to the southeast. Geochemical analysis indicates anoxic to euxinic bottom-water conditions. These conditions were supported by a deep, stratified basin with a lack of circulation.
Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/sequence-stratigrapy-and-depositional-environments-of.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 7963 Bulletin Article

See Also: Events Blog

The Arctic Technology Conference (ATC) awarded its 2015 Spotlight on Arctic Technology Awards at the Comwell Convention Center (Bella Center) in Copenhagen, Denmark to two companies that have made innovative contributions to Arctic exploration and production.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/atc2015-spotlight-winners.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 17122 Events Blog

See Also: Short Course

Here is an introduction to the tools and techniques that geologists and geophysicists use to locate gas and oil, that drillers use to drill the wells and that petroleum engineers use to test and complete the wells and produce the gas and oil. Exercises throughout the course provide practical experience in well log correlation, contouring, interpretation of surface and subsurface, contoured maps, seismic interpretation, well log interpretation, and decline curve analysis.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/sc-basic-petroleum-geology-for-the-non-geologist.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 13607 Short Course

Take advantage of this unique opportunity to learn all the aspects related to the understanding and modeling of fractured reservoirs. Attendees will take geologic concepts and use them in reservoir modeling through hands-on sessions devoted to the examination of outcrop, core and log data. They will use that information and a software to create 3D fractured reservoir models. Using actual Teapot Dome (Wyoming, USA) field data from the Tensleep and Niobrara Shale formations and a hands-on approach, the workshop allows the geoscientist to identify fractures and to construct predictive 3D fracture models that can be used to identify productive zones, plan wells and to create fracture porosity and permeability models for reservoir simulation.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/fs-Casper-Fracture-School.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 1513 Short Course