When Is Unconventional Conventional?

Have you noticed?

If you have a pulse and have been to an AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition (ACE) over the past couple of years or so, or a recent AAPG International Convention and Exhibition (ICE) such as those held in Calgary or Milan, you would have noticed.

Standing room only crowds at sessions focused on gas shales have become the norm.

It’s not limited to oral sessions, either – try finding a spot to view a poster or talk to the author(s). Overcrowding is a sign of the times.

And to add to what I perceive as good news, exploration for gas, oil and liquids in shale reservoirs is no longer restricted to the United States or even North America. These so-called unconventional reservoirs are now the focus of exploration on virtually every continent in the world.

It is not surprising that many AAPG members are actively involved in shale exploration or production, of which many are EMD members who have been instrumental in organizing technical sessions – and running short courses and field trips – at the ACE and ICE meetings, and in supporting Geosciences Technology Workshops (GTWs).

Defining unconventional may not be as easy as one would think – and we are not alone in our metaphysical thoughts about what is conventional and what is not.

The bank and loan industry, and medical and military strategists have these discussions all the time. Discussions as to what is conventional and unconventional have been an ongoing part of their respective dialogues.

Generally speaking, conventional things are of the ordinary while unconventional things would be out of the ordinary.

However, what you may think is ordinary could be completely different from my ordinary.

Natural gas enthusiasts divide unconventional gas into six main categories:

  • Deep gas.
  • Tight gas sands.
  • Gas-containing shales.
  • Coalbed methane.
  • Geopressurized zones.
  • Arctic and sub-sea hydrates.

Whether these gas deposits are unconventional or not changes over time, and from deposit to deposit, with economics dictating whether a particular deposit is unconventional or not.

If a natural gas deposit is too costly to extract, it is unconventional.

For those who prefer Wikipedia, unconventional oil is defined as petroleum produced or extracted using techniques other than the conventional oil well method.

The growing interest in unconventionals is credited in large part to technological advances and innovative new processes – or a cheaper way of doing something. That is all that is needed to turn what was once deemed unconventional to conventional.

Regardless, to make sure we all know what the chatter is about, unconventionals from EMD’s perspective are:

Those energy resources that do not occur in discrete oil and gas reservoirs held in structural or stratigraphic traps in sedimentary basins.

Think gas shales, shale oil, tight gas sands, oil (tar) sands, coalbed methane, oil shales, gas hydrates, etc.

Conversation about shale reservoirs – as demonstrated at the 2010 ACE in Houston and 2011 ICE in Milan – has evolved from that of just a few years ago. Instead of looking for a talk about the next “hot” shale prospect in the United States, technical sessions are now about revising our understanding of the processes under which organic-rich shales are deposited and subsequently evolve into prolific unconventional reservoirs.

And all these new and innovative ideas about shales have spawned a host of additional questions that are being addressed by bringing new technologies into the shale discussions. The use of advanced SEM imaging to view porosity in shales, sometimes the only means to view porosity, is just one example.

New terms also are being spawned. Understanding the nature and distribution of pore types in shales is evoking terms like “nanoporosity” and “organic porosity.”

And even though the concept of unconventionals such as gas shales are becoming more mainstream, understanding flow in shales is anything but conventional. Formulating new models focused on fluid flow in rocks characterized by low porosity and permeability remains challenging.

These topics, among many others, were the subject of much discussion and debate at a recent Hedberg Conference on shales, of which EMD was a co-sponsor.

As we move forward in what is a dynamic energy landscape, topics pertaining to unconventional resources are at a premium.

The organizing committee for both this year’s ACE (April 22-25 in Long Beach, Calif.) and ICE (Sept. 16-19 in Singapore) is committed to incorporating presentations on shales and other unconventional reservoirs. Much is happening throughout the world in the area of unconventional resources.

For a comprehensive overview of current research and stages of development, check out “Unconventional Energy Resources: 2011 Review,” published in Natural Resources Research (Volume 20, Number 4, December 2011, pages 279-327). This gem contains nine unconventional energy resource commodity summaries prepared by various committees of EMD.

In the meantime, EMD remains committed to bringing pertinent information to the AAPG membership about these so-called conventional unconventionals.

Comments (0)


Division Column-EMD Stephen M. Testa

Stephen M. Testa is EMD President-Elect. He is currently serving as Executive Officer of the California State Mining and Geology Board since August, 2005. Testa is a Past-President of the American Geosciences Institute (AGI), the AIPG and the Los Angeles Basin Geological Society.

Division Column-EMD

The Energy Minerals Division (EMD), a division of AAPG, is dedicated to addressing the special concerns of energy resource geologists working with energy resources other than conventional oil and gas, providing a vehicle to keep abreast of the latest developments in the geosciences and associated technology. EMD works in concert with the Division of Environmental Geosciences to serve energy resource and environmental geologists.

View column archives

The Energy Minerals Division (EMD), a division of AAPG, is dedicated to addressing the special concerns of energy resource geologists working with energy resources other than conventional oil and gas, providing a vehicle to keep abreast of the latest developments in the geosciences and associated technology. EMD works in concert with the DEG to serve energy resource and environmental geologists. 

See Also: Bulletin Article

The Sierra Diablo Mountains of west Texas contain world-class exposures of Lower Permian (Leonardian) platform carbonates. As such, these outcrops offer key insights into the products of carbonate deposition in the transitional icehouse to greenhouse setting of the early to middle Permian that are available in few other places. They also afford an excellent basis for examining how styles of facies and sequence development vary between inner and outer platform settings.

We collected detailed data on the facies composition and architecture of lower Leonardian high-frequency cycles and sequences from outcrops that provide more than 2 mi (3 km) of continuous exposure. We used these data to define facies stacking patterns along depositional dip across the platform in both low- and high-accommodation settings and to document how these patterns vary systematically among and within sequences.

Like icehouse and waning icehouse successions elsewhere, Leonardian platform deposits are highly cyclic; cycles dominantly comprise aggradational upward-shallowing facies successions that vary according to accommodation setting. Cycles stack into longer duration high-frequency sequences (HFSs) that exhibit systematic variations in facies and cycle architectures. Unlike cycles, HFSs can comprise symmetrical upward-shallowing or upward-deepening facies stacks. High-frequency sequences are not readily definable from one-dimensional stratigraphic sections but require dip-parallel two-dimensional sections and, in most cases, HFS boundaries are best defined in middle platform settings where facies contrast and offset are greatest. These studies demonstrate that HFSs are the dominant architectural element in many platform systems. As such, the lessons learned from these remarkable outcrops provide a sound basis for understanding and modeling carbonate facies architecture in other carbonate-platform successions, especially those of the middle to upper Permian.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/outcrop-based-characterization-leonardian.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 3661 Bulletin Article

See Also: Energy Policy Blog

China plans to significantly increase its natural gas consumption to help cut its appalling air pollution. But natural gas is still a small part of its energy mix. In addition, and to confound environmentalists, a significant part of China’s gas supply comes from Coal-to-Gas technology, which generates large volumes of greenhouse gas and other pollutants, but does allow China to deliver clean-burning gas to locations with severe air pollution.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/waiting-for-chinas-natural-gas-revolution-2014-08aug-01-hero.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 12908 Energy Policy Blog

See Also: Events Blog

The Arctic Technology Conference (ATC) awarded its 2015 Spotlight on Arctic Technology Awards at the Comwell Convention Center (Bella Center) in Copenhagen, Denmark to two companies that have made innovative contributions to Arctic exploration and production.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/atc2015-spotlight-winners.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 17122 Events Blog

See Also: Field Seminar

The seminar will utilize traverses to examine multiple thrust sheets exposed in Sun River Canyon, the famous Teton Anticline, and an outstanding example of an exposed fractured reservoir along a fault‐propagated fold in Mississippian carbonates as Swift Reservoir. Participants will examine the mechanics of fracturing, folding, and faulting in thrust belt terrains, identify and discuss new ideas regarding the geometry and kinematics of the development of thrust belts, compare seismic interpretation with outcrop examples, and analyze stratigraphic concepts which are essential in the exploration of thrust belt targets.
Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/fs-Fractures-Folds-and-Faults-in-Thrusted-Terrains.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 150 Field Seminar

See Also: Learn! Blog

Want an introduction or review of the mineralogical aspects of reservoir quality evaluation? Well here's your chance, Mineralogy Aspects of Reservoir Quality Evaluation with a Focus on Clay Minerals,  will provide attendees with fundamental information needed to evaluate and assess reservoir quality of conventional and unconventional plays.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/ec-fec-mineralogy-aspects-of-reservoir-quality-evaluation-with-a-focus-on-clay-minerals.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 12227 Learn! Blog