Energy Issues Action Still Pending

Congress returns to work this month after its August recess – and if legislators feel a sense of déjà vu, it is because their agenda includes many issues left unresolved in June and July.

Chief among them is dealing with high energy prices.

There is no doubt that senators and representatives, while spending the past month at home with their constituents, heard much about the pain caused by high gasoline prices. Americans are demanding action, and lawmakers are dutifully responding with lots and lots of action. But they aren’t making much progress.

During June and July hardly a week passed without some new piece of energy legislation tackling access issues, production tax credits, the role of speculators and so on. Each bill offered ideas – some new, some repackaged – to deal with the energy crisis.

Few sponsors of these bills expected them to be enacted – but introducing these ideas allowed them to be vetted, identifying strengths and weaknesses. That’s good, because some of them may form the core of future legislation that receives serious consideration.

But this summer was not a time for serious consideration, and that time probably won’t arrive for several more months. After all, this is an election year. The press conferences, votes held and others blocked, charges and counter-charges are all about political positioning ahead of the November election rather than accomplishing anything.

So what is an AAPG member who is a U.S. citizen to do?

Get engaged.

If ever there was a time to contact your legislator about energy issues, it is now. Visit their local offices or send them a letter.

Later this month, several AAPG members will be in Washington, D.C., for geoCVD (Congressional Visits Day) to meet with their lawmakers and staffs and begin that kind of dialog.

Here at GEO-DC we are doing the same thing, both responding to inquiries and creating opportunities to present fact-based science and thereby inform the policy making process.

One such opportunity occurred on July 11, when AAPG leaders asked me to participate in an energy forum in the Senate. Six Republican senators attended the event, spending two full hours with the four panelists, asking questions on a variety of topics. My topic was the exploration and development potential of the outer continental shelf.

Other panelists included:

  • Marvin Odum, president of Shell Oil, discussing oil shale development.
  • David Vieau, CEO of A123 Systems, talking about plug-in hybrid vehicles.
  • Kevin Book, senior energy policy analyst with FBR & Co., covering energy markets.

We continue to look for such opportunities at the federal level. But it is important to remember that dealing with high energy prices is not just a federal issue, it is also hitting state governments very hard. So while the turmoil persisted in Washington, GEO-DC headed to New Orleans in late July for the National Conference of State Legislators (NCSL) 2008 Legislative Summit.

GEO-DC Director David Curtiss chats during the conference for state legislators.
GEO-DC Director David Curtiss chats during the conference for state legislators. EXPLORER Photo
This annual event plays host to more than 8,000 people from across the nation and the world. The attendees included state legislators, senior legislative staff, federal and state agency personnel, as well as government affairs professionals from corporate and non-profit organizations.

More than 300 organizations exhibited at the meeting, representing a remarkable diversity of interests and topics.

For the second year in a row, AAPG’s Division of Professional Affairs (DPA) had its own booth at NCSL. Rick Ericksen, DPA president, Carl Smith, DPA Government Affairs Committee chair, Don Juckett, GEO-DC’s founding director, and I represented the Association and division at the event.

Many of the attendees wanted to talk about the high price of crude oil and its impact on their constituents back home. We, in turn:

  • Expressed the Association’s views as articulated in AAPG’s statements.
  • Provided information on the science and process of finding oil and natural gas.
  • Talked about our role as a scientific and professional association.

In order to encourage attendees to provide us with their business cards – and thanks to Don Juckett’s handiwork – we held a drawing for two mounted ammonite specimens. I am working with Carl Smith to follow-up with our booth visitors.

Incidentally, the winners of the drawing were Dale Stephens, member of the West Virginia House of Delegates, and Daniel A. Eaton, majority floor leader of the New Hampshire House of Representatives. Congratulations to both!

Our attendance at NCSL was a good reminder that engaging policymakers on energy and environmental issues should not be restricted to the federal level. In fact, getting involved at the state level often can have immediate and significant impact.

As Rick Ericksen indicated in the July EXPLORER column, DPA is providing its members with a new tool to monitor state-level legislative activity. Meanwhile, at GEO-DC we continue to mainly focus on federal legislation, assisting at the state level as opportunities arise.

Unquestionably, lawmakers at all levels of government need the science-based facts and experience that AAPG and DPA members can uniquely provide. We also have the tools to do it properly. Now together we need to help federal, state and local lawmakers turn action into progress.

Comments (0)


Washington Watch

Washington Watch - David Curtiss

David Curtiss served as the Director of AAPG’s Geoscience and Energy Office in Washington, D.C. from 2008-11.

Policy Watch

Policy Watch is a monthly column of the EXPLORER written by the director of AAPG's  Geoscience and Energy Office in Washington, D.C. *The first article appeared in February 2006 under the name "Washington Watch" and the column name was changed to "Policy Watch" in January 2013 to broaden the subject matter to a more global view.

View column archives

See Also: Book

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 8145 Book

See Also: Bulletin Article

Using diverse geologic and geophysical data from recent exploration and development, and experimental results of analysis of gas content, gas capacity, and gas composition, this article discusses how geologic, structural, and hydrological factors determine the heterogeneous distribution of gas in the Weibei coalbed methane (CBM) field.

The coal rank of the Pennsylvanian no. 5 coal seam is mainly low-volatile bituminous and semianthracite. The total gas content is 2.69 to 16.15 m3/t (95.00–570.33 scf/t), and gas saturation is 26.0% to 93.2%. Burial coalification followed by tectonically driven hydrothermal activity controls not only thermal maturity, but also the quality and quantity of thermogenic gas generated from the coal.

Gas composition indicates that the CBM is dry and of dominantly thermogenic origin. The thermogenic gases have been altered by fractionation that may be related to subsurface water movement in the southern part of the study area.

Three gas accumulation models are identified: (1) gas diffusion and long-distance migration of thermogenic gases to no-flow boundaries for sorption and minor conventional trapping, (2) hydrodynamic trapping of gas in structural lows, and (3) gas loss by hydrodynamic flushing. The first two models are applicable for the formation of two CBM enrichment areas in blocks B3 and B4, whereas the last model explains extremely low gas content and gas saturation in block B5. The variable gas content, saturation, and accumulation characteristics are mainly controlled by these gas accumulation models.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/variable-gas-content-saturation-and-accumulation.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 5687 Bulletin Article

See Also: CD DVD

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 4088 CD-DVD

See Also: Energy Policy Blog

Carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) is perhaps commercially viable but not proven at commercial scale, according to 100 clean-energy experts that recently released their recommendations to the White House: "Powering Forward: Presidential and Executive Agency Actions to Drive Clean Energy in America."

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/carbon-capture-and-sequestration-expensive-and-unproven-2014-02feb-03.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 12373 Energy Policy Blog

See Also: Field Seminar

The modern carbonate-evaporite depositional environments along the Abu Dhabi shoreline and offshore Abu Dhabi belong to the few areas of the world where the geoscientist can observe the interplay between carbonate and evaporite sedimentation.
Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/fs-field-trip-to-the-modern-sabkha-environment-abu-dhabi-11nov-2015-hero.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 20582 Field Seminar