California Offshore Fracking Controversy

Published
American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)

January 8 the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a new rule on offshore hydraulic fracturing that takes effect on March 1. The rule adds additional effluent limits and monitoring requirements. Operators would be required to maintain an inventory of chemicals used in drilling operations and report any released into surrounding waters. The new EPA rule applies only to existing development and production platforms, and new exploratory drilling operations in federal waters off the Santa Barbara coast. There are 23 existing production platforms in California federal waters.

Draft rules for onshore and offshore wells have been issued by California requiring companies to test groundwater and alert landowners before fracking or other well stimulation. Companies would also have to disclose the chemicals used These rules go into full effect in 2015. California state waters, which include the giant Wilmington field, have seen almost 200 fracture treatments since the 1990s.

So where is the controversy?

Until recently the public was generally not aware that fracking operations were being conducted offshore. Once the news got out, media coverage and public concern grew. The concerns are similar to those on land–a lack of detailed information on the chemical composition of hydraulic fracturing fluids and flowback water. Offshore operations add another level of concern because platforms are allowed to discharge fluids into the ocean.

EPA has long regulated effluent from offshore platforms; each platform is required to monitor effluent volumes and selected chemical constituents. The effluent is primarily cooling water and produced water from conventional oil and gas operations. The new rules will require much closer monitoring and may lead to additional treatment of fluids or alternate, non-marine disposal methods.

The picture above is platform A in the Dos Cuadras field, which was installed in 1968.

What Can I Do?

Add Item

Enter Notes:
 
* You must be logged in to name and customize your collection.
Recommend Recommend
Printable Version Printable Version Email to a friend Email to a friend

See Also: ACE Program Paper

ACE Program Paper Hall B, Room 3 Imaging the Overturned Limb of a Footwall Syncline in the Western Canadian Fold and Thrust Belt Imaging the Overturned Limb of a Footwall Syncline in the Western Canadian Fold and Thrust Belt Desktop 25931

See Also: Webinar

Webinar Week 17 Pivoting – Critical Minerals and Next Generation Batteries, Part II Week 17 Pivoting – Critical Minerals and Next Generation Batteries, Part II Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/virtual-hq-pivot-critical-minerals-nextgent-battery-part-ll-hero.jpg?width=100&h=100&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=75amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 58006

See Also: Explorer Article

Explorer Article CCS and CCUS face many of the same challenges, but the U in CCUS provides revenue opportunities How the U Adds Value in CCUS How the U Adds Value in CCUS Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/how-the-u-adds-value-in-ccus-hero.jpg?width=100&h=100&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=75amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 66934

See Also: Explorer Director’s Corner

Explorer Director’s Corner The recent pause on all pending LNG permit requests comes at a time when demand is expected to increase 50 percent by 2040. Biden Administration Hamstrings LNG Potential Biden Administration Hamstrings LNG Potential Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/curtiss-david-large-aug22.jpg?width=100&h=100&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=75amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 66906

See Also: Foundation Update

Foundation Update AAPG Foundation Newsletter - March 2024 AAPG Foundation Newsletter - March 2024 Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/blog-foundation-newsletter-march-2024-hero.jpg?width=100&h=100&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=75amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 66897

Energy Policy Office