Pipelines remain an important factor in Alaska's energy future.
Source: From Hieb, 2003, West Virginia Geological Society
Photo courtesy of Joint Pipeline Office
If
you enjoy slow-motion movies, keep an eye on oil and gas development
in Alaska.
While there's
plenty of action, the pace of progress seems glacial.
Here's
the big news.
- A
long-anticipated, 3,500-mile Alaska natural gas pipeline is finally
inching toward reality.
- More
lease acreage will become available in the National Petroleum
Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A).
- Several
new offshore areas will open for petroleum development, including
parts of Bristol Bay and the Beaufort Sea.
If things
go right, new gas resources from NPR-A and other North Slope areas
will feed a major gas pipeline for Canadian and U.S. markets.
The timeframe
for all of this? Years and years.
And years.
Prudhoe
Pipeline
Alaska's
state government has identified a gas pipeline from Prudhoe Bay
as its number one economic initiative.
"It's a
huge revenue boost for the state government, on the order of $400
million a year," said Mark Myers, director of Alaska's Department
of Natural Resources Division of Oil and Gas.
Economics
argue for a 48- to 52-inch line, because tariffs are more efficient
with a large-diameter line and high throughput, Myers said.
"Initial
designs would look at shipping 4-to-4.5 bcf a day, expandable to
5-to-6 bcf through compression," he noted.
Those plans
took a leap forward in October when Congress passed a measure streamlining
the regulatory approval process and providing loan guarantees for
a new Alaskan pipeline.
In June,
a unit of TransCanada Corp. asked Alaska to resume processing its
right-of-way lease application for the proposed Alaska Natural Gas
Transportation System, said Rhea DoBosh, communications manager
for the Joint Pipeline Office (JPO) in Anchorage.
JPO is
a consortium of six state agencies and six federal agencies sharing
regulatory responsibility for oil and gas pipelines in Alaska, primarily
the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS).
The state
held a public review process on the TransCanada application in November
and December, preparing for a final determination in 2005, DoBosh
said.
Current
plans call for a pipeline "most-likely" route extending south from
Prudhoe Bay to Fairbanks and Delta Junction, following the current
TAPS path.
It then
would parallel the Alaskan Highway east into Canada, linking with
existing gas shipping infrastructure in Alberta.
DoBosh
said the application review process involves only state lands right
of way.
"That would
leave a few miles of right of way left to the Canadian border,"
she noted -- most of it private or Alaskan native land.
Estimated
cost of the pipeline project is $20 billion, with the first gas
moving through the system in eight to 10 years.
Doubts and
Delays
Plans for
the Alaska gas line barely crawled forward in recent years, largely
because of economic concerns.
TransCanada
already has announced it may convey its Alaskan right-of-way leases
to another corporation or partnership in the event of a favorable
decision.
"What TransCanada
would like to do is to build the Canadian portion, and they'd like
to have a partner for the U.S. part," DoBosh noted. "We're looking
at $20 billion. That's a lot."
Two key
pieces of legislation, one state and one federal, pushed the pipeline
plan into higher gear.
Alaska's
legislature passed a Stranded Gas Development Act in 1998, to encourage
a pipeline outlet for stranded North Slope gas.
The act
lessened financial risks for a pipeline project by reducing and
delaying tax and fee burdens.
In 2003,
Alaska strengthened and extended the measure.
TransCanada
then filed its renewed application under the stranded gas act.
Congress
added enabling legislation for an Alaskan gas line to its 2005 military
construction appropriations bill.
In addition
to authorizing the pipeline, Congress expedited the federal study,
review and permitting processes.
It also
provided loan guarantees that should lower borrowing costs for pipeline
backers. The guarantee on project loans could reach $18 billion,
or 80 percent of the total capital costs.
Congress
lit a rocket under the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC),
which was given broad authority on environmental and access matters
for the proposed line.
FERC now
expects to issue a decision in February on requirements allowing
gas shippers access to pipeline capacity.
Several
other companies submitted proposals for their own pipeline development
plans, including MidAmerican Energy Holdings Co., an affiliate of
Warren Buffet's Berkshire Hathaway group, and a consortium of North
Slope gas producers.
Some observers
view these alternative proposals as placeholders in political maneuvering
over pipeline rights and construction plans.
However,
the Alaska Natural Gas Development Authority has its own plan for
an all-Alaska LNG project, including a gas line from Prudhoe Bay
to Valdez on existing TAPS right of way.
But it's
unlikely that two gas pipelines will be built, if future North Slope
natural gas production can't secure the economic future of one.
Wanted:
Gas Production
In addition
to 36 trillion cubic feet of known gas reserves, northern Alaska
may offer more than 230 tcf of technically recoverable, conventional
gas, Myers said.
"You can
add into that one of the real sleepers on the North Slope -- gas
hydrates," he said.
The Prudhoe
Bay area alone might hold more than 100 tcf of hydrates, a projected
20 percent economically recoverable, according to Myers.
Add up
all the numbers, and a gas pipeline could have a life of "100 years,
if you believe a significant portion of the resource can be recovered,"
he said.
Known gas
reserves at Prudhoe Bay and Point Thompson alone would not support
the economics for a major gas line, and the ANWR area isn't seen
as heavily gas-prone.
That's
turned industry attention to NPR-A, the 23.5 million-acre petroleum
reserve just inside Alaska's northwest corner.
According
to the U.S. Energy Information Agency, NPR-A contains an estimated
40-85 tcf of technically recoverable, non-associated gas and another
7-17 tcf of recoverable associated gas.
In June,
the Bureau of Land Management issued a draft amendment to its land
use plans for 4.6 million acres in the northeast corner of NPR-A.
ConocoPhillips
and Anadarko discovered a stratigraphic oil play in the Alpine Field
near that area, and have extended it onto NPR-A acreage.
A decision
on opening the additional acres to leasing should come early in
2005, said Susan Childs, BLM project lead for the northeast NPR-A
amendment.
BLM also
will prepare a use plan for the southern/Colville River area of
NPR-A, with a final record of decision likely in three to four years,
she said.
"It's a
slow process, but we're moving forward. We have a multi-use mission,
so we have a variety of issues to consider to protect the environment,"
Childs said.
Two records
of decision issued by the Interior Department in 2004 brightened
the future for NPR-A oil and gas development.
In January,
it ruled that all BLM-managed lands in the 8.8 million-acre northwest
section of NPR-A will be available for oil and gas leases, although
development of 1.57 million environmentally sensitive acres will
be deferred for 10 years.
In November,
the department approved ConocoPhillips' plans to build production
pads for five Alpine satellites.
Two are
on NPR-A acreage, two on native corporation land and one on state
land. ConocoPhillips said development drilling at the two NPR-A
sites could begin in 2008, if it can obtain all permits and clearances,
leading to the first commercial oil production from the petroleum
reserve.
Approval
for initial production from NPR-A represents a small but symbolically
important step, said H. Sterling Burnett, a senior fellow at the
National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas.
"It's not
a wildlife refuge," he said. "It's not a national park. It's been
set aside for 80 years to drill for oil and gas."
Five oil
companies bid $53.9 million for lease tracts covering 1.4 million
acres of NPR-A's northwest section in June.
Seven conservation
groups filed a lawsuit to challenge the lease sale, seeking further
environmental studies and controls.
"At the
present time, with energy prices where they are, with the profound
effect energy has on our society, we should be opening up these
areas," he added.
|