Ad Hoc Committee
on Advisory Council Representation
Tim Rynott,
APRC II Chairman
The Advisory Council Proportional Representation Committee II (APRC
II), formed in June of this year, is an outgrowth of the 2002/2003
ad hoc Advisory Council Proportional Representation Committee (APRC
I). APRC II Committee members include: Chair Tim Rynott, Vice-chair
Don Lewis (Pacific), Sandi Barber (Gulf Coast), Will Green (Southwest),
Paul Hoffman (Gulf Coast), Jean Lemmon (Mid-Con), and Peter Lloyd
(Mid-East).
The specific charge of APRC II is to evaluate whether the sections
of the AAPG are fairly represented by the current design of the
AC, particularly in regards to two of its primary functions – forwarding
a "short list" of nominees for officer candidates and awardees to
the Executive Committee (EC). Its charge also includes presenting
to the House recommendations on AC revisions, based upon its evaluation.
In 1998, the 15 member "Resolution Committee" (chaired by Dan Smith)
intensely studied this issue. Their final recommendation for the
reformulated AC, forwarded with 14 yeas and one abstention, was
debated and passed on the House floor. Now that the reformulated
AC has been "tested" for four years, concerns have been raised that
further modification is needed in regards to fair and equitable
representation.
The History
of APRC I
During
the June 2001 HoD Annual Meeting in Denver, Delegate Clint Moore
introduced a resolution for an "Advisory Council Restructuring Bylaws
Amendment" during "New Business". It was debated and defeated in
a House vote. A more formal proposal was approved by the GCAGS Board
of Directors at their annual meeting in October 2001 and was subsequently
mailed to the EC members, AC members, and House officers. The following
summer House Chairman Terry Hollrah formed an ad hoc committee,
the "Advisory Council Proportional Representation Committee" (APRC
I).
APRC I was charged with evaluating the pros and cons of the "GCAGS"
proposal and to recommend at the next HoD meeting as to whether
it should be endorsed, rejected, or modified. After a very lively
internal and external debate, the committee ultimately voted 4-2
in favor of this proposal. (See Rich Green's report in the SEPT.
2003 Delegates' Voice.) However, in the House meeting this year,
the APRC I report was only briefly mentioned under "New/Old Business",
was not debated on the House floor, and was not forwarded to the
Constitution and Bylaws Committee. The explanation for this included:
1. The committee had not been given sufficient time to thoroughly
investigate all possible modifications; 2. It became apparent that
such a controversial issue necessitated a broader scope of input,
including advice from present and former House leadership, and present
and former AC representatives; 3. The annual meeting agenda was
already very loaded and the thought of another drawn out, exhausting
annual meeting was undesirable; 4. The overriding opinion concurred
that the recommendation would unlikely pass a house vote and more
time was required to garner additional inter-sectional support.
The House officers, recognizing the importance of this issue, unanimously
agreed a second committee should be formed for the next house cycle.
It was later determined that this new committee would have no time
restraints, and would also have the advantage of at least one member
from APRC I, which is Will Green.
Goals
of APRC II
APRC
II recognizes the work accomplished by APRC I and the great deal
of light it shed on the pros and cons of the current AC structure.
ARPC II will augmen the prior committees' work by several actions,
including:
1. Attempting to contact (or poll) as many present and former AC
members as possible;
2. Thoroughly researching the recent voting record of the AC with
respect to the distribution of nominees advanced to the EC for consideration
as officer and awardees candidates.; and
3. Bringing a Resolution to the House floor in Dallas next year,
depending upon the committee findings.
In closing, thanks go to Rich Green, Chairman of APRC I, and his
committee members: Pete Gray, Will Green, Marty Hewitt, Clint Moore,
and Jim Rogers. They provided a great service advancing this issue
to its current state.
|