Divisions to work together

DEG Initiates Renewables Group

I recently attended a meeting in Houston with some of the other elected officers from the DEG, EMD and DPA, along with AAPG Executive Director Rick Fritz and Divisions manager Norma Newby.

The main topic was how the three AAPG Divisions can work together to develop more joint activities, such as sessions, workshops and short courses. One of the action items that came out of the meeting was the need for the AAPG to form a Renewable Energy Committee.

It was agreed that the DEG would initiate the formation of this committee, and it was voted into existence July 22.


Some may wonder why AAPG should be interested in renewable energy.

Charles G. “Chip” Groat, a past DEG president and one of the founding members of the AAPG Global Climate Change Solutions Committee, observed in one of his EXPLORER columns that AAPG members are willing to commit considerable energy and personal time through the AAPG to the consideration of topics that some do and some don’t feel are mainstream to the profession of petroleum geology.

I have found, like Chip did, that many of the companies, agencies and universities that AAPG members work for are engaged in research and projects – such as renewable energy – that may seem to be outside of the domain of mainstream petroleum geology but do fall in the domain of the DEG, EMD or DPA.

As Chip noted, if we don’t engage ourselves in these activities and issues as well we will limit both the AAPG as an organization and also the impact of our profession as geoscientists.

So, as I pondered on the task of forming this committee I asked myself just how much interest might there be among AAPG members, and others, in the topic of renewable energy. I decided one way to find out was to do a little research on my own via the Internet to see what level of interest in renewable energy might be among the energy companies that employ many of AAPG members. I purposefully excluded government agencies and universities from my research.

I was very surprised to find out the majority of the major oil companies, both domestic and international, had very aggressive renewable energy programs, and also that many of the larger independent companies had active renewable energy programs. ExxonMobil, Chevron, BP, Shell, TOTAL, Petrobras, StatoilHydro, Devon, Apache and Anadarko all have very active renewable energy programs.

Most of the programs are centered on the development of bio-fuels; however, there are many companies involved in wind energy, fuel cell research and solar projects. Chevron remains very active in geothermal energy.

I also noted that those companies that had viable renewable energy projects also were actively discussing climate change and the potential effects that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions may have on the environment. Most discussed the need to balance an ever-increasing demand for energy with the need to lessen the carbon footprint the industry leaves on the environment. How to achieve this balance may be the greatest challenge facing the energy industry today.

Discussing these challenges as well as renewable energy research and progress will be the main purpose of the DEG/EMD/DPA Renewable Energy Committee.


One subject area the DEG remains very active in – and one that will help to mitigate the effects of CO2emissions – is carbon capture and sequestration.

The DEG will soon be publishing the first of two special issues of Environmental Geosciences dedicated to the subject of geological carbon sequestration. The first is a great example of geological work being performed on three different geological targets within the Michigan Basin.

CO2 sequestration, renewable energy, GHG emissions and other climate change-related issues are very important to us all and are part of the American Clean Energy and Security Act recently passed by the U.S. House of Representatives. This act, if it becomes law, will impose the first federal restrictions on CO2 emissions, establish a market structure for trading CO2 and promote investment in, and transition to, cleaner-energy technologies.

Comments (0)

 

Division Column-DEG Doug Wyatt

Doug Wyatt, of Aiken, S.C., is director of science research for the URS Corporation Research and Engineering Services contract to the USDOE National Energy Technology Laboratory. He also is a member of the DEG Advisory Board for the AAPG Eastern Section.

Division Column-DEG Mary K. Harris

Mary K. Harris, President, Division of Environmental Geosciences

Division Column-DEG Tom J. Temples

Tom J. Temples is DEG President.

Division Column-DEG Bruce Smith

Bruce Smith is a DEG member and is with the Crustal Geophysics and Geochemistry Science Center of the U.S. Geological Survey in Denver.

Division Column-DEG Michael Jacobs
Michael Jacobs, geologist/hydrogeologist at Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., is DEG President for 2009-10.

Division Column DEG

The Division of Environmental Geosciences (DEG), a division of AAPG, is concerned with increasing awareness of the environment and the petroleum industry and providing AAPG with a scientific voice in the public arena. Among its objectives are educating members about important environmental issues, supporting and encouraging research on the effects of exploration and production on the environment, and communicating scientific information to concerned governmental agencies.

View column archives

See Also: Book

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 3921 Book
Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 4356 Book

See Also: Bulletin Article

Considerable effort has been devoted to the development of simulation algorithms for facies modeling, whereas a discussion of how to combine those techniques has not existed. The integration of multiple geologic data into a three-dimensional model, which requires the combination of simulation techniques, is yet a current challenge for reservoir modeling. This article presents a thought process that guides the acquisition and modeling of geologic data at various scales. Our work is based on outcrop data collected from a Jurassic carbonate ramp located in the High Atlas mountain range of Morocco. The study window is 1 km (0.6 mi) wide and 100 m (328.1 ft) thick. We describe and model the spatial and hierarchical arrangement of carbonate bodies spanning from largest to smallest: (1) stacking pattern of high-frequency depositional sequences, (2) facies association, and (3) lithofacies. Five sequence boundaries were modeled using differential global position system mapping and light detection and ranging data. The surface-based model shows a low-angle profile with modest paleotopographic relief at the inner-to-middle ramp transition. Facies associations were populated using truncated Gaussian simulation to preserve ordered trends between the inner, middle, and outer ramps. At the lithofacies scale, field observations and statistical analysis show a mosaiclike distribution that was simulated using a fully stochastic approach with sequential indicator simulation.

This study observes that the use of one single simulation technique is unlikely to correctly model the natural patterns and variability of carbonate rocks. The selection and implementation of different techniques customized for each level of the stratigraphic hierarchy will provide the essential computing flexibility to model carbonate settings. This study demonstrates that a scale-dependent modeling approach should be a common procedure when building subsurface and outcrop models.

Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/Outcrop-analog-for-an-oolitic-carbonate.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 3727 Bulletin Article

See Also: CD DVD

Desktop /Portals/0/images/_site/AAPG-newlogo-vertical-morepadding.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 4446 CD-DVD

See Also: Field Seminar

The seminar will utilize traverses to examine multiple thrust sheets exposed in Sun River Canyon, the famous Teton Anticline, and an outstanding example of an exposed fractured reservoir along a fault‐propagated fold in Mississippian carbonates as Swift Reservoir. Participants will examine the mechanics of fracturing, folding, and faulting in thrust belt terrains, identify and discuss new ideas regarding the geometry and kinematics of the development of thrust belts, compare seismic interpretation with outcrop examples, and analyze stratigraphic concepts which are essential in the exploration of thrust belt targets.
Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/fs-Fractures-Folds-and-Faults-in-Thrusted-Terrains.jpg?width=50&h=50&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=90amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 150 Field Seminar