Managing Seismicity

American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)

One year ago this month I was sitting in AAPG’s GEO-DC office at the American Geosciences Institute in Alexandria, Va., when a 5.8 magnitude earthquake rocked the state. It was the strongest earthquake I had ever experienced. And in a region unaccustomed to feeling such tremors many wondered if hydraulic fracturing, which was dominating headlines at the time, may have been responsible for the quake.

Fast-forward to earlier this year when I experience several earthquakes and aftershocks in Tulsa. These, too, triggered a lively debate in the media about whether they were related to hydraulic fracturing or other oil and natural gas activities.

Getting to the heart of whether energy production triggers seismic activity is the subject of a new study, titled “Induced Seismicity Potential in Energy Technologies,” released in June by the National Research Council.

The report focuses on four technologies:

  • Geothermal energy.
  • Carbon capture and storage (CCS).
  • Conventional oil and gas, including enhanced oil recovery.
  • Unconventional oil and gas development, such as shale gas, requiring hydraulic fracturing.

The National Research Council is the operating arm of the U.S. National Academies of Science and Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. And it was commissioned to conduct this study by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) after a request from Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M), chair of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.

In his letter to Energy Secretary Steven Chu, Bingaman noted that “much public opposition to the deployment of advanced energy technologies in the United States stems from a lack of clear, trusted information regarding the safety of those new energy facilities for the local communities that are their neighbors. A National Academies study can provide information to these concerned communities …”

The NRC assembled a diverse group of talented and experienced scientists and engineers chaired by Murray Hitzman of the Colorado School of Mines, an AAPG member. Other AAPG members on the committee were Don Clarke and Julie Schmeta.

As the study noted, “Since the 1920s we have recognized that pumping fluids into or out of the Earth has the potential to cause seismic events that can be felt.”

Thus, the study committee’s charge was to look at geothermal, carbon storage, and oil and natural gas technologies to determine the likelihood of these inducing seismic events – but also to identify knowledge gaps and areas of additional scientific research that would be helpful in managing any risks associated with these activities.

The report lists three major findings:

  • The process of hydraulic fracturing a well as presently implemented for shale gas recovery does not pose a high risk for inducing felt seismic events.
  • Injection for disposal of waste water derived from energy technologies into the subsurface does pose some risk for induced seismicity, but very few events have been documented over the past several decades relative to the large number of disposal wells in operation.
  • CCS, due to the large volumes of injected fluids, may have potential for inducing larger seismic events.

According to the report a principal driver of induced seismicity is the volume of fluid extracted or injected into the subsurface and the resulting effect on pore fluid pressure and/or changes in stress regimes in the rocks and around fault zones. When these volumes are roughly balanced the likelihood of triggering seismic activity appears to be lower.

Waste water disposal wells are typically designed to inject into formations with porosity and permeability sufficient to accept large volumes of fluid. So, while there have been several documented cases of induced seismicity related to waste water disposal, the probability of occurrence is low.

Fluid balance is important in geothermal wells, as well. Another factor affecting these wells is the potential for the difference in temperature between the injected fluids and rock to cause contraction and triggering seismic activity. As an example, this has been documented in The Geysers geothermal field in California.

Large-scale injection of super critical CO2 over an extended period has not occurred in either the research CCS projects conducted in the United States or the commercial CCS projects overseas. As a result there is insufficient knowledge of its potential to induce seismicity.

The difficulty in predicting induced seismicity is twofold:

  • First, we are dealing with complex natural geological systems and, frequently, a lack of fundamental geological data needed to adequately understand these systems.
  • Second, we do not have risk assessment models that have been sufficiently validated to be useful tools.

But these models and methodologies can be developed. And the committee urges both increased government cooperation at the federal and state level, as well as an ongoing learning process as energy development progresses resulting in a “best practices protocol” for each energy technology. In fact, they point to a protocol developed by DOE for engineered geothermal systems as a useful template.

Our understanding of the natural systems where we find and produce the energy needed to power modern life improves as we explore and produce. And as the NRC report indicates, the risks of inducing seismic activity, particularly from oil and natural gas activities, are low and manageable.

The complete report is available for download at the National Academies website.

Comments (0)

 

What Can I Do?

Add Item

Enter Notes:
 
* You must be logged in to name and customize your collection.
Recommend Recommend
Printable Version Printable Version Email to a friend Email to a friend

Director's Corner

Director's Corner - David Curtiss

David Curtiss is an AAPG member and was named AAPG Executive Director in August 2011. He was previously Director of the AAPG GEO-DC Office in Washington D.C.

The Director's Corner covers Association news and industry events from the worldview perspective of the AAPG Executive Director.

View column archives

An error has occurred. Error Loading the Article:System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException (0x80131904): Transaction (Process ID 86) was deadlocked on lock | communication buffer resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction. at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection, Action`1 wrapCloseInAction) at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj, Boolean callerHasConnectionLock, Boolean asyncClose) at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.TryRun(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj, Boolean& dataReady) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.FinishExecuteReader(SqlDataReader ds, RunBehavior runBehavior, String resetOptionsString) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReaderTds(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, Boolean async, Int32 timeout, Task& task, Boolean asyncWrite) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReader(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, String method, TaskCompletionSource`1 completion, Int32 timeout, Task& task, Boolean asyncWrite) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.InternalExecuteNonQuery(TaskCompletionSource`1 completion, String methodName, Boolean sendToPipe, Int32 timeout, Boolean asyncWrite) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() at Microsoft.ApplicationBlocks.Data.SqlHelper.ExecuteNonQuery(SqlConnection connection, CommandType commandType, String commandText, SqlParameter[] commandParameters) at Microsoft.ApplicationBlocks.Data.SqlHelper.ExecuteNonQuery(String connectionString, CommandType commandType, String commandText, SqlParameter[] commandParameters) at Microsoft.ApplicationBlocks.Data.SqlHelper.ExecuteNonQuery(String connectionString, String spName, Object[] parameterValues) at PackFlash.DNN.Modules.Publishing.DAL.SqlDataProvider.UpdateArticle_(Int32 ArticleID, Int32 PortalID, Int32 CreatedByUserID, Int32 CurrentOwnerUserID, DateTime CreatedDate, String Title, String SubTitle, String Desciption, Boolean Approved, Boolean Featured, String ArticleText, String PostedArticleText, String NonHtmlContent, String NonHtmlContentOption, String ImageFile, Int32 NumberOfViews, Int32 ModuleID, Int32 PublishedByUserID, DateTime PublishDate, DateTime ExpireDate, DateTime LastModifiedDate, String SearchKeyWords, Boolean DirectToPDF, String PdfFileName, Boolean CustomAuthorship, String Authorship, String ContributorLabel, Int32 IssueToPublishUnder, Int32 MediaType, Boolean ActiveIssueRequired, Decimal AverageRating, Boolean SEOModified, String SEOTitle, String URLTitle, String SEODescription, String SEOKeywords, Boolean CalloutEnabled, Boolean LeadGenerationEnabled, String AuthorizedUserTemplate, String UnauthorizedUserTemplate, Boolean Deleted, DateTime LastCalloutInjectDate, Int32 DetailTabID, String SNHost, String SNFacebookText, Boolean SNFacebookSubmitted, Boolean SNFacebookSubmitPending, String SNFacebookSubmittedTo, Boolean SNFacebookSubmitByProfile, String SNTwitterText, Boolean SNTwitterSubmitted, Boolean SNTwitterSubmitPending, Int32 ContentTypeID, Boolean RequiredAuthorizationForList, String Locale, String _ExtensionString1, String _ExtensionString2, String _ExtensionString3, String _ExtensionString4, String _ExtensionString5, String _ExtensionString6, String _ExtensionString7, String _ExtensionString8, String _ExtensionString9, String _ExtensionString10, DateTime _ExtensionDate1, DateTime _ExtensionDate2, DateTime _ExtensionDate3, DateTime _ExtensionDate4, DateTime _ExtensionDate5, Boolean _ExtensionBool1, Boolean _ExtensionBool2, Boolean _ExtensionBool3, Boolean _ExtensionBool4, Boolean _ExtensionBool5, String _ExtensionBigString1, String _ExtensionBigString2, String _ExtensionBigString3, String _ExtensionBigString4, String _ExtensionBigString5, Int32 _ExtensionInteger1, Int32 _ExtensionInteger2, Int32 _ExtensionInteger3, Int32 _ExtensionInteger4, Int32 _ExtensionInteger5, Int32 SiblingID, String _ExtensionString11, String _ExtensionString12, String _ExtensionString13, String _ExtensionString14, String _ExtensionString15, DateTime _ExtensionDate6, DateTime _ExtensionDate7, DateTime _ExtensionDate8, Boolean _ExtensionBool6, Boolean _ExtensionBool7, Boolean _ExtensionBool8, String _ExtensionBigString6, String _ExtensionBigString7, String _ExtensionBigString8, String _ExtensionExtraBigString1, String _ExtensionExtraBigString2, String _ExtensionExtraBigString3, Boolean _IssueIsActive, Int32 ExtensionInteger6, Int32 ExtensionInteger7, Int32 ExtensionInteger8, Int32 VersionID, Int32 MainArticleID, Int32 PackFlashModuleID, Boolean DisplayRelatedArticlesType1, Boolean DisplayRelatedArticlesType2, Boolean DisplayRelatedArticlesType3, Nullable`1 Lat, Nullable`1 Lon) at PackFlash.DNN.Modules.Publishing.DAL.ControllerArticle.UpdateArticle(InfoArticle objArticle_) at PackFlash.DNN.Modules.Publishing.Common.injectCalloutsIntoArticle(Int32 ArticleID, PortalSettings PortalSettings, UserInfo userinfo) at PackFlash.DNN.Modules.Publishing.ArticleDetail.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) ClientConnectionId:d046a7e5-08e2-4234-9d7b-bc6cb35d583b

See Also: Short Course

Short Course In Conjunction with AAPG 2016 Annual Convention & Exhibition (ACE) - American Association of Petroleum Geologist (AAPG) ACE SC 05 | Introduction to Oil Sands Thin Section Analysis ACE SC 05 | Introduction to Oil Sands Thin Section Analysis Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/ace2015-sc17-oil-sands-hero.jpg?width=100&h=100&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=75amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 23785

See Also: Visiting Geoscientist Presentation

Visiting Geoscientist Presentation "Geoscience and Politics: the Hydrofracking Debate" by Dr. David Weinberg (Practical Risk LLC) "Geoscience and Politics: the Hydrofracking Debate" by Dr. David Weinberg (Practical Risk LLC) Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/vg-david-weinberg-AAPG-UTSA-Student-Chapter-hero.jpg?width=100&h=100&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=75amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 26738

See Also: ACE Program Paper

ACE Program Paper Four Seasons Ballroom 4 Integrating Geochemical and Petrographic Analyses to Better Understand Proximal to Distal Variations in Source Rocks, Using an Example From the Bashkirian in the UK Integrating Geochemical and Petrographic Analyses to Better Understand Proximal to Distal Variations in Source Rocks, Using an Example From the Bashkirian in the UK Desktop /Portals/0/images/ace/2015/luncheon heros/ace2015-tp7-basin-modeling.jpg?width=100&h=100&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=75amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 15556
ACE Program Paper Four Seasons Ballroom 4 Turbidity Currents That Co-Evolve With Channels Over Lengths as Much as 1000 km: How Can They Do it? Turbidity Currents That Co-Evolve With Channels Over Lengths as Much as 1000 km: How Can They Do it? Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/ace2015-sepm-channels.jpg?width=100&h=100&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=75amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 14857
ACE Program Paper Four Seasons Ballroom 2 & 3 The Exploration Dilemma: Gateway to New Paradigms in Discovery Thinking The Exploration Dilemma: Gateway to New Paradigms in Discovery Thinking Desktop /Portals/0/PackFlashItemImages/WebReady/ace2015-dpa-discovery-thinking-forum.jpg?width=100&h=100&mode=crop&anchor=middlecenter&quality=75amp;encoder=freeimage&progressive=true 15937